Date: Oct 20, 2013 4:47 PM
Author: Bart Goddard
Subject: Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0

Dan Christensen <> wrote in

> Well, at least you now seem to have come around to the fact that 0^0
> is ambiguous with two,

I've never said it wasn't ambiguous. What I've said
is that your crap is 1. not new and 2. incorrect.

And I'm still right and you're still a crackpot.