Date: Oct 20, 2013 6:14 PM
Author: Dan Christensen
Subject: Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0

On Sunday, October 20, 2013 5:58:10 PM UTC-4, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Sunday, October 20, 2013 4:47:09 PM UTC-4, Bart Goddard wrote:
>

> > Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote in
>
> >
>
> > news:fa63ea39-9a0d-4d72-bf71-0c3acfbc2290@googlegroups.com:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > Well, at least you now seem to have come around to the fact that 0^0
>
> >
>
> > > is ambiguous with two,
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > I've never said it wasn't ambiguous.
>
>
>
> Perhaps I had you confused with one your fellow crackpots here.
>
>
>
> Whether there are two possibilities or ten or an infinite number, the end result is the same.
>


Perhaps you can give us your own formal definition of exponentiation on N, Bart?

Dan
Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my new math blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com