Date: Oct 21, 2013 9:16 AM
Author: JT
Subject: Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0

Den måndagen den 21:e oktober 2013 kl. 14:47:52 UTC+2 skrev Bart Goddard:
> Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> wrote in news:l43067$pgn$1
>
> @news.albasani.net:
>
>
>

> > Dan's definition of ^ doesn't allow the value of 0^0 to be inferred.
>
> > That is a big hint that the definition is inadequate.
>
>
>
> Especially when the whole point was supposed to be
>
> about 0^0. His "new way" of looking at the issue seems
>
> to be "pretend 0 doesn't exist. Problem solved."


Exactly