Date: Oct 30, 2013 2:32 PM
Author: JT
Subject: Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0
Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 19:04:50 UTC+1 skrev Peter Percival:

> jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote:

>

>

>

> > And again zero is not a number,

>

>

>

> Why do you think that? 1/0 may be problematic, but none of 0/1, square

>

> 0, sqrt 0 are.

>

Well 0^2+tiger is certainly tiger.

And 0 sqrt + tiger is certainly tiger.

And 0/1 isn't an operation, so we have to add a tiger.

>

>

> > and there certainly is no correct answer to question like 1/0, 0/1, square 0, sqrt 0. Because there is certainly no operation to perform no more than elephant squared + tiger.

>

>

>

>

>

> --

>

> What a piece of work is a man. How noble in reason, how infinite

>

> in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable,

>

> in action how like an angel, in apprehension how like a God

>

> Shakespeare through the mouth of Hamlet