Date: Oct 30, 2013 5:33 PM
Author: Peter Percival
Subject: Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0

Bart Goddard wrote:
> Robin Chapman <R.J.Chapman@ex.ac.uk> wrote in news:l4rrgu$joa$1@dont-
> email.me:
>

>> Come on, Bart, you've been around sci.math for a while;
>> however egregiously daft Dan's ideas on exponentiation might
>> be, they are nowhere near breaking any records for idiocy

>
> Well, gee, you'd think that one would be allowed some
> hyperbole on a _math_ group....


And an ellipsis.

--
What a piece of work is a man. How noble in reason, how infinite
in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable,
in action how like an angel, in apprehension how like a God
Shakespeare through the mouth of Hamlet