Date: Oct 31, 2013 2:48 AM
Author: David Bernier
Subject: Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0

On 10/30/2013 06:28 PM, Richard Tobin wrote:
> In article <l4rrgu$joa$>,
> Robin Chapman <> wrote:

>> Come on, Bart, you've been around sci.math for a while;
>> however egregiously daft Dan's ideas on exponentiation might
>> be, they are nowhere near breaking any records for idiocy
>> even just in sci.math.

> Very true. I propose that 0^0 be defined to be 0.999...9
> -- Richard

I've been critisized in the past for not giving a precise
definition of infinity, and from what I remember,
breaking records of inaptitude here in sci.math is
not for the typical new-comer, in my opinion. :)

David Bernier