Date: Nov 1, 2013 11:04 PM
Author: Dan Christensen
Subject: Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0

On Friday, November 1, 2013 7:11:58 PM UTC-4, Bart Goddard wrote:
> Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote in
>
> news:5f6b8192-54f3-4b25-a15a-db41049b629a@googlegroups.com:
>
>
>

> > I have 0^0 being a natural
>
> > number, nothing else -- not a specific value since there are
>
> > infinitely many unique, exponent-like functions on N, each with a
>
> > different value for 0^0, but identical otherwise.
>
>
>
> Just answer the question. Is 0^0 defined in your system
>
> or not?



As I have said repeatedly, it is assumed to be a natural number, but no specific value is assigned to it. So, yes, that makes it "undefined." What is your point, Barty?

Dan
Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my new math blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com