Date: Nov 2, 2013 6:13 PM
Author: Michael F. Stemper
Subject: Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0

On 11/02/2013 04:38 PM, Virgil wrote:
> In article <685bd338-7570-426a-b2cb-07089fa9693f@googlegroups.com>,
> PotatoSauce <kiwisquash@gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> In practice, 0^0 = 1 works just fine.
>
> Unless one wants 0^X to be continuous at X = 0.


Which is normally not a requirement when working in the
naturals -- the context of this discussion. I don't think
that anybody's said that 0^0 can or should be defined for
the reals.

--
Michael F. Stemper
A preposition is something you should never end a sentence with.