Date: Nov 3, 2013 4:07 PM
Author: Bart Goddard
Subject: Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0
Paul <email@example.com> wrote in
> my inability to understand Rado's paper
> on Canonical Ramsey theory and my original question still stands. The
> thread is titled "Problem understanding Rado's proof of the Canonical
> Ramsey Theorem". Many thanks for any help you can give me.
I don't think I can help you with this. I can't even come
up with any advice you couldn't come up with on your own.
All I can do is encourage you: Hang in there, it's the
journey, not the destination.