Date: Mar 9, 2014 8:52 PM
Author: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Infinity: The Story So Far
On 3/8/2014 2:30 PM, Virgil wrote:

> But such carefulness with the truth is well beyond WM's capabilities.

Virgil, over the years a carefulness with the truth is part of

conscientiousness with the truth. Here at least with mathematical

truth and logical truth, for example in definition with at least

given terms to establish constants, predicates, relations, then it

is not enough to have a definition of the integers, rather the

framework about it defines the sophistication of the conscientious

acknowledgment of the facts about the numbers, here as from an

inductive set and each finite n-set or initial segment of ordinals

or ordinal.

What is required is the carefulness of the truth that it is beyond

the standard consequences of the definitions.

Here then it is for the least amount that is infinite and the least

amount that is continuous. Where there isn't that, the numbers

aspire to it. For, the greatest amount is infinite and continuous.

Carefulness with the truth requires having a quite direct grasp of

it.

This, compared to carefulness about "truths".

Then, for me, luckily I wrote it as I saw fit here with the grasp in

foundations and the usual chance in mathematics at finding something

new in foundations (zero). Then it was simply to expound upon

foundations that course would bear out. This then simply made

enough sense to me that I could go on as I saw fit about it. Here

for example the general comment then is of the lift, to make sense.

The point in that would be the estimation on the high energy lines,

then as those are usually interpolated or carried out, then general

idea of the usual features and effects of systems large and small in

the large, the usual effects are stochastic and measurable there

must be some mathematical explanation for them.