```Date: Mar 21, 2014 4:20 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: � 454   Equality and the axioms of natural numbers

In article <a280559d-fcb6-4ca3-b4fb-f881b5edbbf3@googlegroups.com>, mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:> On Friday, 21 March 2014 01:08:38 UTC+1, Virgil  wrote:> > In article <4bJWu.19896\$x%2.3254@fx02.iad>,> > > >  "Dan Christensen" <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote:> > > > > > > > > Then let us know whether pi is a natural number - from the Peano axioms > > > > > which, according to you, "fully capture the common intuition of the > > > natural > > > > > numbers".> > > > > > > > First give us your definition of pi.> > It is the circumference of an ideal circle divided by its diameter.> You can also understand the area of this circle divided by it radius^2 as pi.> > > > > > > > I suspect that your definition will clash with the Peano axioms using > > either 0 or 1 as the non-successor natural and x + 1 as successor of x> > That is obviuos. But the modern logicians do not know what +1 means.The ones outside of  WM's wild weird world of WMytheology do,but WM can only speak for those incarcerated within  his WMytheology.--
```