Date: May 28, 2014 7:24 PM
Author: William December Starr
Subject: Re: nasa.gov/scientific-consensus
In article <F9qhv.1366102$Oa6.email@example.com>,
benj <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> CO2 is clearly wrong, but as for climate disruption being man-made
> that is another issue. There are LOTS of other credible candidates
> there. Including, CFCs, Space shuttle chemicals, air pollution
> (not CO2), the hydrogen bombs set off in space creating new
> radiation belts, HAARP, and God knows what other classified
> projects. Weather modification for use in warfare has LONG been
> under development. No doubt it's coming along quite nicely now.
Yes, they've reached the point that it's only thirty years away.