Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
User Profile: gimpelt_@_otmail.com
|
 |
|
|
User Profile for: gimpelt_@_otmail.com
|
|
UserID:
|
850705
|
|
Name:
|
gimpeltf@hotmail.com
|
|
Email:
|
|
|
Registered:
|
4/20/12
|
|
Total Posts:
|
13
|
|
Recent Messages
|
Discussion
|
Posted
|
|
1
|
Have sent off-line a PDF of the four plots themselves graphed all together.
|
sci.stat.math.independent
|
Dec 9, 2012 4:39 PM
|
|
2
|
Please agree to or improve on the following interaction nomenclature
|
sci.stat.math.independent
|
Oct 31, 2012 9:41 PM
|
|
3
|
PS - Our control set expansion from 1 to 3 is not only scientifically
justifiable, but scientifically obligatory ....
|
sci.stat.math.independent
|
Sep 6, 2012 7:56 AM
|
|
4
|
Full results of test-suite on fold a1 AFTER intra-family Bonferroni correction
|
sci.stat.math.independent
|
Jul 4, 2012 5:44 PM
|
|
5
|
Re: New question: could u on c*L (no logs) be logarithmic (over ALL
length intervals)
|
sci.stat.math.independent
|
Jun 15, 2012 2:28 PM
|
|
6
|
New question: could u on c*L (no logs) be logarithmic (over ALL
length intervals)
|
sci.stat.math.independent
|
Jun 14, 2012 2:46 PM
|
|
7
|
Re: Our first control group result is precisely how we want AML's
program to behave with control group data ....
|
sci.stat.math.independent
|
Apr 28, 2012 7:33 PM
|
|
8
|
Re: Our first control group result is precisely how we want AML's
program to behave with control group data ....
|
sci.stat.math.independent
|
Apr 28, 2012 6:02 PM
|
|
9
|
Re: Mapping the equations of 2 pairs of correlations between (x1,x2)
and (x1,x3) to 1<=n<=4 quadric surfaces
|
sci.stat.math.independent
|
Apr 21, 2012 1:28 AM
|
|
10
|
Re: Correct way to normalize an rmsd-based distance metric used in
repeated trials of pairs
|
sci.stat.math.independent
|
Apr 21, 2012 12:20 AM
|
Show all user messages
|
|
