Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/kb
List of forum topicsenRe: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3<br> = 0.333...
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10262718&tstart=0#10262718
> On 10/23/2017 11:59 AM, netzweltler wrote:

Oct 23, 2017 6:25:11 PMOct 23, 2017 6:25:11 PMjames.g.burns@att.net0Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3<br> = 0.333... (S = Lim S)
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10262717&tstart=0#10262717
]]>Oct 23, 2017 6:21:24 PMOct 23, 2017 6:21:24 PMtennesb@gmail.com0It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3<br> = 0.333... (S = Lim S)
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10262719&tstart=0#10262719
]]>Oct 23, 2017 6:21:23 PMOct 23, 2017 6:21:23 PM1Re: The STATU debates - saved for posterity.
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10262629&tstart=0#10262629
blunder for not knowing lim n->oo 1/n = 0:

Current ranking:

Euler blunders: 0 ]]>Oct 23, 2017 6:00:59 PMOct 23, 2017 6:00:59 PMbursejan@gmail.com0The STATU debates - saved for posterity.
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10262632&tstart=0#10262632
]]>Oct 23, 2017 6:00:58 PMOct 23, 2017 6:00:58 PM1Re: The STATU debates - saved for posterity.
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10262559&tstart=0#10262559
said, if you write 10 paths of solutions in an answer, you wont get a correct mark. Because]]>Oct 23, 2017 5:42:54 PMOct 23, 2017 5:42:54 PMbursejan@gmail.com0The STATU debates - saved for posterity.
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10262562&tstart=0#10262562
]]>Oct 23, 2017 5:42:53 PMOct 23, 2017 5:42:53 PM1Re: Einsteinians: Professors of Showbiz and Science Fiction
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10262557&tstart=0#10262557
Brian Cox, Jeff Forshaw, Why Does E=mc2?: (And Why Should We]]>Oct 23, 2017 5:33:37 PMOct 23, 2017 5:33:37 PMpvalev@yahoo.com0Einsteinians: Professors of Showbiz and Science Fiction
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10262561&tstart=0#10262561
]]>Oct 23, 2017 5:33:36 PMOct 23, 2017 5:33:36 PM1Re: Szemeredi's theorem on arithmetic progressions
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10262516&tstart=0#10262516
> I've had no luck persuading others to look at the elementary proof]]>Oct 23, 2017 5:13:45 PMOct 23, 2017 5:13:45 PMben.usenet@bsb.me.uk0