Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/kb
List of forum topicsenRe: Difference between pure and applied math
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9568728&tstart=0#9568728
> Thank you for your very thoughtful answer. I understand the division > was created]]>Aug 21, 2014 8:39:41 AMAug 21, 2014 8:39:41 AMpeterxpercival@hotmail.com0Re: Difference between pure and applied math
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9567661&tstart=0#9567661
Thank you for your very thoughtful answer. I understand the division was created so then people with pure structural interests could]]>Aug 20, 2014 1:10:17 PMAug 20, 2014 1:10:17 PMrafael.anschau@gmail.com1Re: Difference between pure and applied math
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9563579&tstart=0#9563579
> Ok, so it´s an activity centric division-what]]>Aug 17, 2014 9:44:54 PMAug 17, 2014 9:44:54 PMhrubin@skew.stat.purdue.edu2Re: Difference between pure and applied math
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9563578&tstart=0#9563578
> > > It seems to me the difference is arbitrary, and there´s no timeless > > > infallible concept to tell]]>Aug 17, 2014 9:41:56 PMAug 17, 2014 9:41:56 PMtimsn274@aol.com0Re: Difference between pure and applied math
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9561327&tstart=0#9561327
doing- rather than a structure-centered division (what structures are being]]>Aug 15, 2014 8:35:32 PMAug 15, 2014 8:35:32 PMrafael.anschau@gmail.com4Re: Difference between pure and applied math
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9561082&tstart=0#9561082
> It seems to me the difference is arbitrary, and]]>Aug 15, 2014 4:01:26 PMAug 15, 2014 4:01:26 PMmagidin@math.berkeley.edu5Difference between pure and applied math
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9561007&tstart=0#9561007
infallible concept to tell the former from the latter. For]]>Aug 15, 2014 2:37:07 PMAug 15, 2014 2:37:07 PMrafael.anschau@gmail.com6Re: Borel Compact
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9559295&tstart=0#9559295
> A metric space (S,d) is a Borel compact when > for all closed bounded K, K is]]>
Aug 14, 2014 8:29:11 AMAug 14, 2014 8:29:11 AMmarsh@panix.com0Re: Borel Compact
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9554894&tstart=0#9554894
> A metric space (S,d) is a Borel compact when > for all]]>Aug 12, 2014 7:27:49 PMAug 12, 2014 7:27:49 PMmichael.h.deckers@googlemail.com1Re: Borel Compact
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9553859&tstart=0#9553859
A metric space (S,d) is a Borel compact when for all closed bounded K, K is compact.