Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/kb
List of forum topicsenRe: Connected Quotients
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9809676&tstart=0#9809676
> On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 5:32:13 AM UTC-6,]]>Jul 3, 2015 11:06:31 AMJul 3, 2015 11:06:31 AMdavecullen@gmail.com0Re: Connected Quotients
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9809070&tstart=0#9809070
> S/A is the quotient space of S with all the]]>Jul 2, 2015 3:41:17 PMJul 2, 2015 3:41:17 PMdavecullen@gmail.com1Question about a function of 3 random variables
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9804801&tstart=0#9804801
with constant velocity such that each particle travels in a straight line]]>Jun 25, 2015 7:29:15 AMJun 25, 2015 7:29:15 AMintuitionist1@gmail.com0Connected Quotients
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9803081&tstart=0#9803081
to a sinble point. C(x) is the connected componet of x within S.

If]]>Jun 23, 2015 7:32:11 AMJun 23, 2015 7:32:11 AMmarsh@panix.com2Full of Holes Conjectures
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9798474&tstart=0#9798474
Let C = { Kj | j in N } be a pairwise disjoint, countable collection of simply connected, compact subsets of R^2. Is S = R^2 - \/C]]>Jun 17, 2015 7:38:54 AMJun 17, 2015 7:38:54 AMmarsh@panix.com0Re: A number-theoretic rationale for leaving 0^0 undefined
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9789812&tstart=0#9789812
> > Rather than 0^0=1, consider the following]]>Jun 5, 2015 9:10:59 AMJun 5, 2015 9:10:59 AMDan_Christensen@sympatico.ca0A form of Klee-Minty fully formally proven?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9788892&tstart=0#9788892
Is there a source (book/script/...) which gives a complete and fully formal proof that the simplex algorithm (in its max-form)]]>Jun 4, 2015 12:51:51 PMJun 4, 2015 12:51:51 PMa_l_e_x_0@yahoo.com0Re: A number-theoretic rationale for leaving 0^0 undefined
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9779214&tstart=0#9779214
> Rather than 0^0=1, consider the following definition: > > (1) 0^0=0 > (2) x^0 = 1 for x=/=0]]>May 22, 2015 7:01:36 AMMay 22, 2015 7:01:36 AMjkcender1Lag polynomial with argument in time series
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9763616&tstart=0#9763616
> I'm following > May 4, 2015 9:21:20 AMMay 4, 2015 9:21:20 AMfranklin.macintosh@gmail.com0Re: A number-theoretic rationale for leaving 0^0 undefined
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9762193&tstart=0#9762193
In school we were introduced to exponentiation as follows, starting with the]]>May 1, 2015 9:17:50 PMMay 1, 2015 9:17:50 PMDan_Christensen@sympatico.ca0