http://mathforum.org/kb List of forum topics en http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=5498175&tstart=0#5498175 At 16:52 14/11/2006, Gunnar Berg wrote:

>Dear all.
>In perusing Cauchys "Cours d'analyse" (1821) I have]]> Dec 7, 2006 4:19:09 PM Dec 7, 2006 4:19:09 PM ajuhel@nordnet.fr 0 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=5498170&tstart=0#5498170 L'expression française "solution de continuité" est un faux ami et n'a pas
le sens auquel on pourrait s'attendre. Elle provient de la]]> Dec 7, 2006 3:17:10 PM Dec 7, 2006 3:17:10 PM francois.bruand@freesurf.ch 0 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=5438010&tstart=0#5438010 On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Gunnar Berg <gunnar@math.uu.se>

>
> Dear all.
> In perusing Cauchys]]> Nov 22, 2006 4:06:05 PM Nov 22, 2006 4:06:05 PM wcw@math.psu.edu 0 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=5438009&tstart=0#5438009 Dear Gunnar Berg,

> What puzzles me is the last phrase - "solution de continuite" -
> I simply cannot make]]> Nov 22, 2006 1:48:49 PM Nov 22, 2006 1:48:49 PM jgautero@unice.fr 0 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=5438014&tstart=0#5438014
The expression "solution de continuité", like the
corresponding one in Portuguese (and I guess in
other Latin languages), means]]> Nov 22, 2006 12:39:59 PM Nov 22, 2006 12:39:59 PM jfqueiro@mat.uc.pt 0 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=5438017&tstart=0#5438017 Le 14/11/06 16:52, dans « Gunnar Berg » <gunnar@math.uu.se> a écrit :

>
> Dear all.
> In]]> Nov 22, 2006 1:44:45 AM Nov 22, 2006 1:44:45 AM cl.marti@wanadoo.fr 0 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=5387665&tstart=0#5387665 Dear all.
In perusing Cauchys "Cours d'analyse" (1821) I have come across the
following (p.35):

"Enfin, lorsqu'un fonction f(x)]]> Nov 14, 2006 10:52:35 AM Nov 14, 2006 10:52:35 AM gunnar@math.uu.se 6 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=5387700&tstart=0#5387700 On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, A.W.F. Edwards wrote:

> Introduced in 1893 by Karl Pearson for the statistical distribution]]> Oct 28, 2006 7:56:52 AM Oct 28, 2006 7:56:52 AM fred.shapiro@yale.edu 0 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=5387664&tstart=0#5387664 My guess is that the term "normal number" is just intended to reflect
the idea that most numbers are bound to be "normal" in this sense.]]> Oct 28, 2006 7:51:32 AM Oct 28, 2006 7:51:32 AM fqgouvea@COLBY.EDU 0 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=5316163&tstart=0#5316163 On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, judith grabiner <jgrabine@pitzer.edu>
passed on the following question:
>
> A]]> Oct 23, 2006 4:27:18 PM Oct 23, 2006 4:27:18 PM wcw@math.psu.edu 8