Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/kb
List of forum topicsenRe: quadprog too slow
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7929379&tstart=0#7929379
> "sally" wrote in message]]>Nov 28, 2012 10:09:18 AMNov 28, 2012 10:09:18 AMsaad.badaoui@edhec.edu0Re: quadprog too slow
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7928907&tstart=0#7928907
> I was able to speed up my solver]]>Nov 27, 2012 2:52:15 PMNov 27, 2012 2:52:15 PMsaad.badaoui@edhec.edu1Re: quadprog too slow
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7848578&tstart=0#7848578
If you have a convex problem, or if]]>Jul 11, 2012 4:00:19 PMJul 11, 2012 4:00:19 PMnull@null.com2Re: quadprog too slow
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=6450955&tstart=0#6450955
Clpmex seems to need a license. Therefore, bpmpdmex might be the only free option for large-scale sparse QP problems. However,]]>Oct 6, 2008 3:00:27 PMOct 6, 2008 3:00:27 PMaliensunmin@gmail.com3Re: quadprog too slow
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=6450929&tstart=0#6450929
I'm facing almost exactly the same problem. Therefore I would like to try out clpmex as well. I wonder should I download the]]>Oct 6, 2008 2:35:06 PMOct 6, 2008 2:35:06 PMaliensunmin@gmail.com0Re: quadprog too slow
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=6239551&tstart=0#6239551
MATLAB interfaces that I am aware of

"hicham bouchnaif" <bouchnaif@gmail.com>]]>Jun 2, 2008 5:21:02 AMJun 2, 2008 5:21:02 AMloefberg@control.ee.ethz.ch1Re: quadprog too slow
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=6239457&tstart=0#6239457
I ll try to test it for a higher scale. by the way do you happen to know any other free]]>Jun 2, 2008 2:55:04 AMJun 2, 2008 2:55:04 AMbouchnaif@gmail.com2Re: quadprog too slow
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=6235788&tstart=0#6235788
<g1kut8$g50$1@fred.mathworks.com>... >]]>May 29, 2008 8:32:01 AMMay 29, 2008 8:32:01 AMloefberg@control.ee.ethz.ch7Re: quadprog too slow
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=6235575&tstart=0#6235575
> The alternatives are interfaced to MATLAB, or do you mean > that you won't accept mex?

no it's]]>May 28, 2008 8:55:04 PMMay 28, 2008 8:55:04 PMbouchnaif@gmail.com8Re: quadprog too slow
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=6235574&tstart=0#6235574
thanx for the link. I think that QPC supports only dense matrices which means that it doesn't suit large scale]]>May 28, 2008 8:50:18 PMMay 28, 2008 8:50:18 PMbouchnaif@gmail.com0