Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/kb
List of forum topicsenRe: Inclusive and exclusive definitions... again!
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7024673&tstart=0#7024673
Mar 29, 2010 10:12:24 PMMar 29, 2010 10:12:24 PMAllan Turton0Re: Inclusive and exclusive definitions... again!
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7023564&tstart=0#7023564
On Mar 28, 2010, at 3:37 PM, GS Chandy wrote:

> Allan Turton posted Mar 27, 2010 12:34]]>Mar 28, 2010 11:12:27 PMMar 28, 2010 11:12:27 PMtalmanl@gmail.com0Re: Inclusive and exclusive definitions... again!
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7023149&tstart=0#7023149
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Jonathan Groves >]]>Mar 28, 2010 7:15:05 PMMar 28, 2010 7:15:05 PMgsc0Re: Inclusive and exclusive definitions... again!
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7023147&tstart=0#7023147
> I wouldn't mind (well, not too much) if a government > or]]>Mar 28, 2010 5:37:56 PMMar 28, 2010 5:37:56 PMgsc1Re: Inclusive and exclusive definitions... again!
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7022931&tstart=0#7022931
> Allan and others, > >]]>Mar 28, 2010 3:04:28 PMMar 28, 2010 3:04:28 PMkirby.urner@gmail.com0Re: Inclusive and exclusive definitions... again!
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7022941&tstart=0#7022941
When we think about various ways we can define words like rectangle and trapazoid, we in logic and math sometimes]]>Mar 28, 2010 1:42:01 PMMar 28, 2010 1:42:01 PMBill Marsh0Re: Inclusive and exclusive definitions... again!
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7022822&tstart=0#7022822
> ... imagine if we showed > kids pictures of Saint Bernards exclusively with the > label "dog" for]]>Mar 27, 2010 5:27:02 PMMar 27, 2010 5:27:02 PMBill Marsh0Re: Inclusive and exclusive definitions... again!
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7022327&tstart=0#7022327
Mar 27, 2010 3:04:03 AMMar 27, 2010 3:04:03 AMAllan Turton0Re: Inclusive and exclusive definitions... again!
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7019878&tstart=0#7019878
On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Allan Turton wrote:

> I suspect not much will change unless some authority sets out]]>Mar 24, 2010 10:56:49 PMMar 24, 2010 10:56:49 PMtalmanl@gmail.com0Re: Inclusive and exclusive definitions... again!
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7019882&tstart=0#7019882
that seems "natural" to me and always has, its the way I was taught. One exception is "kite" versus]]>Mar 24, 2010 10:56:47 PMMar 24, 2010 10:56:47 PMniederberger@comcast.net0