Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/kb
List of forum topicsenRe: Musatov responds to WM on Cantor: intelligence, <br> real, judge for yourself: Cantor’s idea seems to me to ass<br> ume because two sets converge to infinity the nature of infi<br> nity and the number of elements in each set must become equa<br> l.
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10298229&tstart=0#10298229
> On Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:50:29 PM UTC-7, Transfer]]>Dec 7, 2017 8:06:14 AMDec 7, 2017 8:06:14 AM4musatov@gmail.com0Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=10298228&tstart=0#10298228
> On Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:57:58 PM UTC-7, Transfer]]>Dec 7, 2017 8:03:09 AMDec 7, 2017 8:03:09 AM4musatov@gmail.com0Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8353025&tstart=0#8353025
> On Jun 17, 12:59 pm, MoeBlee]]>Feb 17, 2013 10:15:21 AMFeb 17, 2013 10:15:21 AMmarty.musatov@gmail.com1Re: Musatov responds to WM on Cantor: intelligence, <br> real, judge for yourself: Cantor’s idea seems to me to ass<br> ume because two sets converge to infinity the nature of infi<br> nity and the number of elements in each set must become equa<br> l.
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8352802&tstart=0#8352802
> On Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:50:29 PM UTC-7, Transfer]]>Feb 17, 2013 9:19:56 AMFeb 17, 2013 9:19:56 AMmarty.musatov@gmail.com0Re: Musatov responds to WM on Cantor: intelligence, <br> real, judge for yourself: Cantor’s idea seems to me to ass<br> ume because two sets converge to infinity the nature of infi<br> nity and the number of elements in each set must become equa<br> l.
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8352801&tstart=0#8352801
> On Jun 17, 2:37 am, Simplane Simple Plane]]>Feb 17, 2013 9:16:24 AMFeb 17, 2013 9:16:24 AMmarty.musatov@gmail.com2Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7125316&tstart=0#7125316
wrote: > On Jun 17, 10:30 pm, Tim Little]]>Jul 12, 2010 5:07:01 AMJul 12, 2010 5:07:01 AMross.finlayson@gmail.com0Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7112223&tstart=0#7112223
"Owen Jacobson" <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> wrote in message news:2010063022395694615-angrybaldguy@gmailcom... Jul 1, 2010 12:21:13 AMJul 1, 2010 12:21:13 AMwebbfamily@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au0Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7112168&tstart=0#7112168
> "Owen Jacobson" <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> wrote in message]]>Jun 30, 2010 10:39:56 PMJun 30, 2010 10:39:56 PMangrybaldguy@gmail.com1Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7110653&tstart=0#7110653
"Owen Jacobson" <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> wrote in message news:2010062819564372407-angrybaldguy@gmailcom... Jun 29, 2010 4:33:09 AMJun 29, 2010 4:33:09 AMwebbfamily@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au2Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7110427&tstart=0#7110427
> "Owen Jacobson" <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> wrote in message]]>Jun 28, 2010 7:56:43 PMJun 28, 2010 7:56:43 PMangrybaldguy@gmail.com3