<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>










<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>Math Forum</title>
        <link>http://mathforum.org/kb</link>
        <description>List of forum topics</description>
        <language>en</language>


        <item>
            <title>Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8353025&amp;tstart=0#8353025</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:57:58 PM UTC-7, Transfer Principle wrote:<br><font color="#660066">&gt; On Jun 17, 12:59 pm, MoeBlee]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Feb 17, 2013 10:15:21 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Feb 17, 2013 10:15:21 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>marty.musatov@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Musatov responds to WM on Cantor: intelligence, &lt;br>	real, judge for yourself: Cantor’s idea seems to me to ass&lt;br>	ume because two sets converge to infinity the nature of infi&lt;br>	nity and the number of elements in each set must become equa&lt;br>	l.</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8352802&amp;tstart=0#8352802</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Sunday, February 17, 2013 6:16:24 AM UTC-8, Musatov wrote:<br><font color="#660066">&gt; On Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:50:29 PM UTC-7, Transfer]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Feb 17, 2013 9:19:56 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Feb 17, 2013 9:19:56 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>marty.musatov@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Musatov responds to WM on Cantor: intelligence, &lt;br>	real, judge for yourself: Cantor’s idea seems to me to ass&lt;br>	ume because two sets converge to infinity the nature of infi&lt;br>	nity and the number of elements in each set must become equa&lt;br>	l.</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8352801&amp;tstart=0#8352801</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:50:29 PM UTC-7, Transfer Principle wrote:<br><font color="#660066">&gt; On Jun 17, 2:37 am, Simplane Simple Plane]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Feb 17, 2013 9:16:24 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Feb 17, 2013 9:16:24 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>marty.musatov@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7125316&amp;tstart=0#7125316</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Jun 20, 1:57 am, "Ross A. Finlayson" &lt;ross.finlay...@gmail.com&gt;<br>wrote:<br><font color="#660066">&gt; On Jun 17, 10:30 pm, Tim Little]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Jul 12, 2010 5:07:01 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Jul 12, 2010 5:07:01 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>ross.finlayson@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7112223&amp;tstart=0#7112223</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[<br>"Owen Jacobson" &lt;angrybaldguy@gmail.com&gt; wrote in message <br>news:2010063022395694615-angrybaldguy@gmailcom...<br><font]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Jul 1, 2010 12:21:13 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Jul 1, 2010 12:21:13 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>webbfamily@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7112168&amp;tstart=0#7112168</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On 2010-06-29 04:33:09 -0400, Peter Webb said:<br><br><font color="#660066">&gt; "Owen Jacobson" &lt;angrybaldguy@gmail.com&gt; wrote in message]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Jun 30, 2010 10:39:56 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Jun 30, 2010 10:39:56 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>angrybaldguy@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7110653&amp;tstart=0#7110653</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[<br>"Owen Jacobson" &lt;angrybaldguy@gmail.com&gt; wrote in message <br>news:2010062819564372407-angrybaldguy@gmailcom...<br><font]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Jun 29, 2010 4:33:09 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Jun 29, 2010 4:33:09 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>webbfamily@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7110427&amp;tstart=0#7110427</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On 2010-06-28 02:16:28 -0400, Peter Webb said:<br><br><font color="#660066">&gt; "Owen Jacobson" &lt;angrybaldguy@gmail.com&gt; wrote in message]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Jun 28, 2010 7:56:43 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Jun 28, 2010 7:56:43 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>angrybaldguy@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7110421&amp;tstart=0#7110421</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On 2010-06-28 05:35:37 -0400, Tim Little said:<br><br><font color="#660066">&gt; On 2010-06-28, Virgil &lt;Virgil@home.esc&gt; wrote:</font><br><font]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Jun 28, 2010 7:27:30 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Jun 28, 2010 7:27:30 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>angrybaldguy@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7110140&amp;tstart=0#7110140</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[In article &lt;slrni2gr79.jrj.tim@soprano.little-possums.net&gt;,<br> Tim Little &lt;tim@little-possums.net&gt; wrote:<br><br><font]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Jun 28, 2010 1:55:16 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Jun 28, 2010 1:55:16 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>Virgil@home.esc</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>

