<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>










<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>Math Forum</title>
        <link>http://mathforum.org/kb</link>
        <description>List of forum topics</description>
        <language>en</language>


        <item>
            <title>Re: Einstein's factor of 2 in starlight deflection</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7931768&amp;tstart=0#7931768</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Einstein's factor of 2 was the right adjustment as later observations show.<br>If spacetime curvature is gravity or influences gravity then it should]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Dec 3, 2012 5:05:31 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Dec 3, 2012 5:05:31 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Einstein's factor of 2 in starlight deflection</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7872712&amp;tstart=0#7872712</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Saturday, 20 August 2011 18:45:57 UTC+1, H.Jones  wrote:<br><font color="#660066">&gt; Einstein's original formula for deflection of light]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Aug 22, 2012 11:50:24 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Aug 22, 2012 11:50:24 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Einstein's factor of 2 in starlight deflection</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7640163&amp;tstart=0#7640163</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On the subject of the ideal Master mass, 5.5098x10^29kg and the equally ideal proton monitor, 6.0714199x10^-27kg, we must also consider the role of]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Jan 7, 2012 1:38:56 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Jan 7, 2012 1:38:56 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>h.jones</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Einstein's factor of 2 in starlight deflection</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7595593&amp;tstart=0#7595593</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[The subject matter here has digressed somewhat from title's subject, the bending of starlight under the Sun's gravitational pull.  It rather evolved]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Oct 27, 2011 9:24:03 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Oct 27, 2011 9:24:03 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>h.jones</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Einstein's factor of 2 in starlight deflection</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7584986&amp;tstart=0#7584986</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[The problem with the Bohr radius is that it is an artefact of the electron; neither does the comparison provide us with an exact indication of the]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Oct 9, 2011 3:58:01 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Oct 9, 2011 3:58:01 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>h.jones</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Einstein's factor of 2 in starlight deflection</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7565552&amp;tstart=0#7565552</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Sep 3, 6:47 pm, "H.Jones" &lt;h.jone...@googlemail.com&gt; wrote:<br><font color="#660066">&gt; On Aug 23, 12:21 pm, "H.Jones"]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Sep 10, 2011 8:11:59 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Sep 10, 2011 8:11:59 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>quantum.dotproduct@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Einstein's factor of 2 in starlight deflection</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7561382&amp;tstart=0#7561382</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Aug 23, 12:21 pm, "H.Jones" &lt;h.jone...@googlemail.com&gt; wrote:<br><font color="#660066">&gt; To obtain g at Planck time we merely divide our]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Sep 3, 2011 1:47:40 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Sep 3, 2011 1:47:40 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>h.jones</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Einstein's factor of 2 in starlight deflection</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7531828&amp;tstart=0#7531828</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[What the above demonstrates is that the spatial deflection, 2GM/Rc^2,<br>is not angular deflection. That is, radian does not equal radius.<br>In fact]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Aug 24, 2011 9:58:51 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Aug 24, 2011 9:58:51 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>h.jones</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Einstein's factor of 2 in starlight deflection</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7531829&amp;tstart=0#7531829</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[ <br>]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Aug 24, 2011 9:58:50 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Aug 24, 2011 9:58:50 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author></jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Einstein's factor of 2 in starlight deflection</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7524014&amp;tstart=0#7524014</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[The simplest deflection model to follow is the orbital path.  There is<br>one important difference in that the speed of our light or]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Aug 20, 2011 2:45:50 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Aug 20, 2011 2:45:50 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>h.jones</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>

