http://mathforum.org/kb List of forum topics en http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7637999&tstart=0#7637999 > > > MoeBlee wrote:
> > > > "And indeed set theory is not consistent with]]> Jan 4, 2012 12:18:49 AM Jan 4, 2012 12:18:49 AM grahamcooper7@gmail.com 0 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7637996&tstart=0#7637996 > On Jan 3, 8:27 pm, Graham Cooper]]> Jan 4, 2012 12:04:18 AM Jan 4, 2012 12:04:18 AM grahamcooper7@gmail.com 1 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7637988&tstart=0#7637988 > MoeBlee wrote:

Jan 3, 2012 9:37:14 PM Jan 3, 2012 9:37:14 PM modemobe@gmail.com 2 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7637985&tstart=0#7637985 > On Jan 3, 3:44 pm, Graham Cooper]]> Jan 3, 2012 9:27:53 PM Jan 3, 2012 9:27:53 PM grahamcooper7@gmail.com 3 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7637727&tstart=0#7637727
> What you are saying is equivalent]]> Jan 3, 2012 5:38:52 PM Jan 3, 2012 5:38:52 PM modemobe@gmail.com 4 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7637709&tstart=0#7637709 > On Jan 3, 2:51 pm, Graham Cooper]]> Jan 3, 2012 4:44:11 PM Jan 3, 2012 4:44:11 PM grahamcooper7@gmail.com 5 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7637701&tstart=0#7637701 <60bb646b-408e-4570-bddc-300d04a340e1@n6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de>]]> Jan 3, 2012 4:34:43 PM Jan 3, 2012 4:34:43 PM virgil@ligriv.com 0 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7637700&tstart=0#7637700 > > set theory is not consistent with the]]> Jan 3, 2012 4:24:07 PM Jan 3, 2012 4:24:07 PM modemobe@gmail.com 6 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7637698&tstart=0#7637698
>
> > Every set of]]> Jan 3, 2012 4:19:26 PM Jan 3, 2012 4:19:26 PM mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de 1 http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7637678&tstart=0#7637678 > On Jan 3, 8:05 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de>]]> Jan 3, 2012 3:51:48 PM Jan 3, 2012 3:51:48 PM grahamcooper7@gmail.com 7