<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>










<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>Math Forum</title>
        <link>http://mathforum.org/kb</link>
        <description>List of forum topics</description>
        <language>en</language>


        <item>
            <title>Re: [Hake's] Is &quot;Education Research&quot; &quot;Scientific Research&quot; ? YES!&quot;</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7910792&amp;tstart=0#7910792</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Clyde Greeno posted Oct 22, 2012 3:56 AM (GSC's comments interspersed):<br><font color="#660066">&gt;<br>&gt; GS:<br>&gt; <br>&gt; In my earlier]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Oct 22, 2012 1:48:39 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Oct 22, 2012 1:48:39 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>gsc</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: [Hake's] Is &quot;Education Research&quot; &quot;Scientific Research&quot; ? YES!&quot;</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7910352&amp;tstart=0#7910352</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[GS:<br><br>In my earlier response to Hake's "Yes!", I am truly not challenging (or even <br>talking about) Boaler or Bishop or Milgram. I am]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Oct 21, 2012 6:26:06 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Oct 21, 2012 6:26:06 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>greeno@malei.org</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: [Hake's] Is &quot;Education Research&quot; &quot;Scientific Research&quot; ? YES!&quot;</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7910203&amp;tstart=0#7910203</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Clyde Greeno posted Oct 20, 2012 12:21 PM (GSC's remarks precede and are interspersed):<br><br>It is refreshing indeed to read a counter-argument]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Oct 21, 2012 1:11:09 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Oct 21, 2012 1:11:09 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>gsc</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: [Hake's] Is &quot;Education Research&quot; &quot;Scientific Research&quot; ? YES!&quot;</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7909696&amp;tstart=0#7909696</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Is Hake's "Yes!" defensible???<br><br>Even without reference to Boaler's papers, the NRC's Education Center's criteria for "scientific educational]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Oct 20, 2012 2:51:49 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Oct 20, 2012 2:51:49 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>greeno@malei.org</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>[Hake's] Is &quot;Education Research&quot; &quot;Scientific Research&quot; ? YES!&quot;</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7909706&amp;tstart=0#7909706</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[[this message has not yet arrived]<br>]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Oct 20, 2012 2:51:48 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Oct 20, 2012 2:51:48 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author></jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>

