<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>










<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>Math Forum</title>
        <link>http://mathforum.org/kb</link>
        <description>List of forum topics</description>
        <language>en</language>


        <item>
            <title>the Berke article Re: flaw in short proof</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7934076&amp;tstart=0#7934076</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Read the Berke paper, thanks. I see a lot of work has gone into search functions and frequency functions for twin primes. <br><br>Is there a history]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Dec 8, 2012 2:56:58 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Dec 8, 2012 2:56:58 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>manontheclaphamomnibus</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: flaw in short proof</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7928208&amp;tstart=0#7928208</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Excellent, thanks trj. I shall look at that. <br><br>Anything you'd particularly recommend on congruence classes affecting assumptions of how numbers]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Nov 26, 2012 8:32:53 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Nov 26, 2012 8:32:53 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>manontheclaphamomnibus</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: flaw in short proof</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7927011&amp;tstart=0#7927011</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[I found that there is already a decent collection of references<br>available online:<br><br><a]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Nov 23, 2012 12:54:35 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Nov 23, 2012 12:54:35 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>trj</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: flaw in short proof</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7926816&amp;tstart=0#7926816</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[The mistake in expression (1)<br><br>//<br>the number of valid n between (p_n-1)^2 and (p_n)^2 = integer value of<br>1/2 . 1/3 . 3/5 ..... ((p_n) -]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Nov 22, 2012 12:37:46 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Nov 22, 2012 12:37:46 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>manontheclaphamomnibus</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: flaw in short proof</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7926803&amp;tstart=0#7926803</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Please give those pointers to the literature, trj. <br><br>Thanks for your patience.<br>]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Nov 22, 2012 11:54:48 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Nov 22, 2012 11:54:48 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>manontheclaphamomnibus</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: flaw in short proof</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7926614&amp;tstart=0#7926614</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[<font color="#660066">&gt; Should I try to involve Mr Plutonium?</font><br><br>Mr Plutonium would not know what you are talking about, as he <br>does]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Nov 22, 2012 2:23:36 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Nov 22, 2012 2:23:36 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>trj</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: flaw in short proof</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7926330&amp;tstart=0#7926330</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Should I try to involve Mr Plutonium?<br>]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Nov 21, 2012 7:40:50 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Nov 21, 2012 7:40:50 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>manontheclaphamomnibus</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>flaw in short proof</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7924242&amp;tstart=0#7924242</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[One poster has very kindly taken the time to look at this, and has said that I make an unwarranted assumption about the congruence of primes. I]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Nov 16, 2012 1:38:31 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Nov 16, 2012 1:38:31 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>manontheclaphamomnibus</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>

