<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>










<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>Math Forum</title>
        <link>http://mathforum.org/kb</link>
        <description>List of forum topics</description>
        <language>en</language>


        <item>
            <title>Faraday's lines-of-force as magnetic current density  in Faraday's&lt;br> own law Chapt13.4.05 rest-mass #1036 New Physics #1156 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7928604&amp;tstart=0#7928604</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Nov 27, 1:35 am, Archimedes Plutonium<br>&lt;plutonium.archime...@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br>(snip)<br><font color="#660066">&gt;<br>&gt;  &gt; &gt;]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Nov 27, 2012 3:05:14 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Nov 27, 2012 3:05:14 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>magnetic current density deriving rest-mass 1839 and 137 Chapt13.4.05&lt;br> rest-mass #1035 New Physics #1155 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7928581&amp;tstart=0#7928581</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Now we do have an accurate means of measuring the distances of the<br>nuclei of atoms and the distances of the chemical bond of atoms and we<br>find]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Nov 27, 2012 2:35:19 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Nov 27, 2012 2:35:19 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>

