Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/kb
List of forum topicsenRe: Would effective gun control laws be 'unacceptable social engineering'?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7944187&tstart=0#7944187
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 10:22 PM, GS]]>Dec 27, 2012 4:04:46 AMDec 27, 2012 1:36:51 PMgsc0Re: Would effective gun control laws be 'unacceptable social<br> engineering'?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7944188&tstart=0#7944188
> > Dec 27, 2012 4:29:11 AMDec 27, 2012 4:29:11 AMgsc0Re: Would effective gun control laws be 'unacceptable social engineering'?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943933&tstart=0#7943933
> Responding to Kirby Urner's post (pasted]]>Dec 26, 2012 1:22:56 PMDec 26, 2012 11:47:37 PMkirby.urner@gmail.com0Re: Would effective gun control laws be 'unacceptable social<br> engineering'?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7944184&tstart=0#7944184
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:22 AM, GS]]>Dec 26, 2012 11:12:05 PMDec 26, 2012 11:12:05 PMgsc0Re: Would effective gun control laws be 'unacceptable social<br> engineering'?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943807&tstart=0#7943807
I agree with much that you state/claim.]]>Dec 26, 2012 1:22:55 AMDec 26, 2012 1:22:55 AMgsc1Re: Would effective gun control laws be 'unacceptable social engineering'?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943469&tstart=0#7943469
> > On Dec 23, 2012, at 2:22 PM,]]>Dec 24, 2012 12:24:55 PMDec 25, 2012 2:16:27 PMuprho@yahoo.com0Re: Would effective gun control laws be 'unacceptable social engineering'?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943482&tstart=0#7943482
> Dec 24, 2012 11:43:48 PMDec 25, 2012 12:11:29 PMgsc0Re: Would effective gun control laws be 'unacceptable social engineering'?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943231&tstart=0#7943231
> > Note that there exist "company unions" that are > formed with]]>Dec 23, 2012 9:19:11 PMDec 24, 2012 12:09:54 PMgsc0Re: Would effective gun control laws be 'unacceptable social engineering'?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943240&tstart=0#7943240
On Dec 23, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Paul Tanner <upprho@gmail.com> wrote: