<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>










<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>Math Forum</title>
        <link>http://mathforum.org/kb</link>
        <description>List of forum topics</description>
        <language>en</language>


        <item>
            <title>Re: TIME TO REFUTE THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943447&amp;tstart=0#7943447</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Well, the debate with Loschmidt seems never to have been successfully resolved either. I remember reading something rather detailed about it. The]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Dec 25, 2012 6:57:03 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Dec 25, 2012 6:57:03 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>Peter Duveen</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: TIME TO REFUTE THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943429&amp;tstart=0#7943429</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Maxwell introduced his "demon" in 1867 in a letter to Tait:<br><br><a href="http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/maxwell/"]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Dec 25, 2012 4:18:58 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Dec 25, 2012 4:18:58 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>pvalev@yahoo.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: TIME TO REFUTE THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943185&amp;tstart=0#7943185</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Well, there were quite a few discussions in the 19th Century about some of the assumptions of thermodynamics. One of them involved Josef Loschmidt,]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Dec 24, 2012 10:30:15 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Dec 24, 2012 10:30:15 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>Peter Duveen</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: TIME TO REFUTE THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943140&amp;tstart=0#7943140</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Monday, December 24, 2012 11:42:01 AM UTC+2, Pentcho Valev wrote:<br><font color="#660066">&gt; A reasonable argument advanced by an intelligent]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Dec 24, 2012 4:45:59 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Dec 24, 2012 4:45:59 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>Tonicopm@yahoo.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>TIME TO REFUTE THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7943138&amp;tstart=0#7943138</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[A reasonable argument advanced by an intelligent design advocate:<br><br><a href="http://www.math.utep.edu/Faculty/sewell/AML_3497.pdf"]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Dec 24, 2012 4:42:01 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Dec 24, 2012 4:42:01 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>pvalev@yahoo.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>

