Math Forum http://mathforum.org/kb List of forum topics en Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7978229&tstart=0#7978229 > In article
>]]> Jan 5, 2013 10:30:58 PM Jan 5, 2013 10:30:58 PM fomJUNK@nyms.net 0 Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7977396&tstart=0#7977396 <553bf1fb-5267-47c9-ba16-70e7f6f4db8d@u19g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de>]]> Jan 5, 2013 6:58:52 PM Jan 5, 2013 6:58:52 PM virgil@ligriv.com 1 Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7977395&tstart=0#7977395 <559dcb41-5aea-496d-8194-8c3fa8f80e5d@v7g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de>]]> Jan 5, 2013 6:56:45 PM Jan 5, 2013 6:56:45 PM virgil@ligriv.com 0 Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7977104&tstart=0#7977104
> Actually, real math suggests that there are reals so]]> Jan 5, 2013 5:18:57 PM Jan 5, 2013 5:18:57 PM mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de 2 Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7977103&tstart=0#7977103 <bba43ced-8d33-44b5-b36a-6ad572bff3cb@4g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

 Jan 5, 2013 5:17:15 PM Jan 5, 2013 5:17:15 PM virgil@ligriv.com 0 Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7977102&tstart=0#7977102 > On 1/5/2013 6:56 AM, WM wrote:
>
 Jan 5, 2013 5:15:57 PM Jan 5, 2013 5:15:57 PM mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de 1 Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7977029&tstart=0#7977029 <5c682c83-3374-4ccb-a12c-3aa42bb54286@u19g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de>]]> Jan 5, 2013 4:36:15 PM Jan 5, 2013 4:36:15 PM virgil@ligriv.com 3 Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7976256&tstart=0#7976256
> Nonsense. A real number need not be given by a string of digits. In
> most]]> Jan 5, 2013 11:47:27 AM Jan 5, 2013 11:47:27 AM fomJUNK@nyms.net 2 Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7975209&tstart=0#7975209
> Clearly, the set of reals is pairwise]]> Jan 5, 2013 8:06:38 AM Jan 5, 2013 8:06:38 AM mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de 4 Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=7975207&tstart=0#7975207
> Sure, there's only countably many finite]]> Jan 5, 2013 7:56:52 AM Jan 5, 2013 7:56:52 AM mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de 4