Math Forum http://mathforum.org/kb List of forum topics en Re:Making things Up and Calling Myself a Scientist: the Life of plutonium http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8129344&tstart=0#8129344 > Should Ohm's law be V = iR or V = i + R Chapt15.34
> explaining
> Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations]]> Jan 23, 2013 6:41:52 AM Jan 23, 2013 6:41:52 AM bacle 0 Re: ATOM TOTALITY Unproven Made-Up Garbage. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8129276&tstart=0#8129276 > On Jan 22, 2:58 pm, Archimedes Plutonium
> <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
 Jan 23, 2013 6:26:19 AM Jan 23, 2013 6:26:19 AM bacle 0 Re: should Ohm's law be V=iR or V=i +R Chapt15.34 explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1169 New Physics #1289 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8129274&tstart=0#8129274 > Should Ohm's law be V = iR or V = i + R Chapt15.34
> explaining
> Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations]]> Jan 23, 2013 6:23:33 AM Jan 23, 2013 6:23:33 AM bacle 0 Re:You are a Waste-of-Life, LOSER http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8129272&tstart=0#8129272 Jan 23, 2013 6:22:49 AM Jan 23, 2013 6:22:49 AM bacle 0 Re: should Ohm's law be V=iR or V=i +R Chapt15.34 explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1169 New Physics #1289 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8129216&tstart=0#8129216
>Alright, some good news and some bad news. The bad news]]> Jan 23, 2013 6:19:56 AM Jan 23, 2013 6:19:56 AM bacle 0 experimental proof of dB/dK Chapt15.34 explaining Superconductivity<br> from Maxwell Equations #1173 New Physics #1293 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8128258&tstart=0#8128258 <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 23, 1:21 am,]]> Jan 23, 2013 2:52:12 AM Jan 23, 2013 2:52:12 AM plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com 0 why mercury superconducts at 4K but not silver Chapt15.34 explaining<br> Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1172 New Physics #1292 ATOM<br> TOTALITY 5th ed http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8128163&tstart=0#8128163 <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2:58 pm,]]> Jan 23, 2013 2:37:09 AM Jan 23, 2013 2:37:09 AM plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com 1 term dB/dK where temperature is involved in the Maxwell Equations<br> Chapt15.34 explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1171 New<br> Physics #1291 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8128037&tstart=0#8128037 <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should Ohm's law be V = iR or]]> Jan 23, 2013 2:21:50 AM Jan 23, 2013 2:21:50 AM plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com 2 Ohm's law is really V = iN Chapt15.34 explaining Superconductivity<br> from Maxwell Equations #1170 New Physics #1290 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8125100&tstart=0#8125100 <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should Ohm's law be V = iR or]]> Jan 22, 2013 4:36:05 PM Jan 22, 2013 4:36:05 PM plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com 1 should Ohm's law be V=iR or V=i +R Chapt15.34 explaining<br> Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1169 New Physics #1289 ATOM<br> TOTALITY 5th ed http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8124883&tstart=0#8124883 Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1169 New Physics #1289 ATOM
TOTALITY]]> Jan 22, 2013 3:58:20 PM Jan 22, 2013 3:58:20 PM plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com 9