Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/kb
List of forum topicsenRe: For nonrejection of H0, don't we want high signifance?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8899661&tstart=0#8899661
> On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 11:31:11 AM UTC+12, Paul]]>Apr 26, 2013 12:11:22 PMApr 26, 2013 12:11:22 PMhrubin@skew.stat.purdue.edu0Re: For nonrejection of H0, don't we want high signifance?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8899417&tstart=0#8899417
"Jeff Miller" wrote in message news:9de41597-61aa-4417-b5e7-2a293c689f19@googlegroups.com...

The confidence interval approach is]]>Apr 26, 2013 4:35:11 AMApr 26, 2013 4:35:11 AMdajhawk@hotmail.co.uk0Re: For nonrejection of H0, don't we want high signifance?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8899265&tstart=0#8899265
> from a conceptual standpoint, say H0 was some generic]]>Apr 25, 2013 8:37:50 PMApr 25, 2013 8:37:50 PMmilleratotago@yahoo.com2Re: For nonrejection of H0, don't we want high signifance?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8898128&tstart=0#8898128
Apr 24, 2013 5:52:10 AMApr 24, 2013 5:52:10 AMlicas_@hotmail.com0Re: For nonrejection of H0, don't we want high signifance?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8897900&tstart=0#8897900
"Paul" wrote in message news:41b75327-afe1-488e-81f6-8ab9ddb30e08@z10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 23, 3:51 pm, Rich Ulrich]]>Apr 23, 2013 10:39:16 PMApr 23, 2013 10:39:16 PMdajhawk@hotmail.co.uk0Re: For nonrejection of H0, don't we want high signifance?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8897768&tstart=0#8897768
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT),]]>Apr 23, 2013 7:31:11 PMApr 23, 2013 7:31:11 PMpaul.domaskis@gmail.com4Re: For nonrejection of H0, don't we want high signifance?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8897636&tstart=0#8897636
<paul.domaskis@gmail.com> wrote:

>I'm perusing Apr 23, 2013 3:51:45 PMApr 23, 2013 3:51:45 PMRich.Ulrich@comcast.net5For nonrejection of H0, don't we want high signifance?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=8897609&tstart=0#8897609
Apr 23, 2013 3:15:20 PMApr 23, 2013 3:15:20 PMpaul.domaskis@gmail.com7