Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/kb
List of forum topicsenRe: archmimedean valuation is infinity-adic numbering
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9123971&tstart=0#9123971
be base-infinity, each symbol is isometrically isomorphic to an integer; you'd need]]>May 15, 2013 4:29:34 PMMay 15, 2013 4:29:34 PMSpace998@hotmail.com0archmimedean valuation is infinity-adic numbering
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9123651&tstart=0#9123651
"my congruence surds are not p-adic numbers, but that's what most mathematicians mistook them,]]>May 14, 2013 10:38:40 PMMay 14, 2013 10:38:40 PMSpace998@hotmail.com1Re: What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9123650&tstart=0#9123650
> > How can one intuitively grasp the geometry of a]]>May 14, 2013 10:37:38 PMMay 14, 2013 10:37:38 PMFredJeffries@gmail.com0Re: What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9123332&tstart=0#9123332
<328201a8-c347-45f9-9491-89862e1563e6@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>, mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote:

May 14, 2013 4:33:58 AMMay 14, 2013 4:33:58 AMvirgil@ligriv.com2Re: What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9123331&tstart=0#9123331
> In article >]]>May 14, 2013 4:27:32 AMMay 14, 2013 4:27:32 AMmike4ty4@yahoo.com3Re: What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9123289&tstart=0#9123289
<6bb5684c-3fc0-48a1-8de5-cc51f7478a49@a15g2000pbu.googlegroups.com>, mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote:

May 14, 2013 2:48:28 AMMay 14, 2013 2:48:28 AMvirgil@ligriv.com4Re: What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9123266&tstart=0#9123266
> In article >]]>May 13, 2013 11:50:58 PMMay 13, 2013 11:50:58 PMmike4ty4@yahoo.com5Re: What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9123261&tstart=0#9123261
William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> wrote:

May 13, 2013 11:25:57 PMMay 13, 2013 11:25:57 PMvirgil@ligriv.com0Re: What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9123252&tstart=0#9123252
<bf23b508-9d6c-459b-b797-5022f1dd0e5d@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>, mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote:

May 13, 2013 11:17:31 PMMay 13, 2013 11:17:31 PMvirgil@ligriv.com6Re: What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=9123245&tstart=0#9123245
> On Mon, 13 May 2013, mike3 wrote: May 13, 2013 10:51:09 PMMay 13, 2013 10:51:09 PMmike4ty4@yahoo.com0