<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>










<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>Math Forum</title>
        <link>http://mathforum.org/kb</link>
        <description>List of forum topics</description>
        <language>en</language>


        <item>
            <title>Re: Plausibility Arguments</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1461124&amp;tstart=0#1461124</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Putting two things together (I think): Analying invalid arguments is<br>certainly important, but the most important invalid arguments are]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Mar 14, 1997 10:04:02 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Mar 14, 1997 10:04:02 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>wgmartin@erols.com</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Plausibility Arguments</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1461123&amp;tstart=0#1461123</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[<br>(By coincidence, my previous post made reference to a proof that all<br>triangles were isosceles and I was thinking of the very one]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Mar 13, 1997 6:47:29 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Mar 13, 1997 6:47:29 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>alper@csli.Stanford.EDU</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Plausibility Arguments</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1461122&amp;tstart=0#1461122</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Thu, 13 Mar 1997, Ted Alper wrote:<br><br><font color="#660066">&gt; Draw two intersecting circles, of somewhat different radius -- call<br>&gt;]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Mar 13, 1997 4:33:02 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Mar 13, 1997 4:33:02 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>toom@the-college.iwctx.edu</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Plausibility Arguments</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1461119&amp;tstart=0#1461119</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[I think Andre has raised some interesting, if not completely<br>unproblematic, points. I'd suggest that one issue is how fully we]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Mar 13, 1997 2:57:52 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Mar 13, 1997 2:57:52 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>mikegold@UMICH.EDU</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Plausibility Arguments</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1461121&amp;tstart=0#1461121</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[<br>Lou Talman wrote:<br><br><font color="#660066">&gt;Purposeful construction of misleading arguments strikes me, in most<br>&gt;instances, as]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Mar 13, 1997 1:35:50 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Mar 13, 1997 1:35:50 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>alper@csli.Stanford.EDU</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Plausibility Arguments</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1461120&amp;tstart=0#1461120</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[<font color="#660066">&gt; Date sent:      Wed, 12 Mar 97 23:55:28 -0700<br>&gt; From:           Lou Talman &lt;me@talmanl.mscd.edu&gt;<br>&gt; To:]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Mar 13, 1997 9:37:52 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Mar 13, 1997 9:37:52 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>COTTRELL@CURRIC.DIST.DAVIS.K12.UT.US</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Plausibility Arguments</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1461118&amp;tstart=0#1461118</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[On Wed, 12 Mar 1997, Lou Talman wrote:<br><br><font color="#660066">&gt; Purposeful construction of misleading arguments strikes me, in <br>&gt; most]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Mar 13, 1997 6:35:00 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Mar 13, 1997 6:35:00 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>toom@the-college.iwctx.edu</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Plausibility Arguments</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1461117&amp;tstart=0#1461117</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[Ted Alper wrote: <br><br><font color="#660066">&gt;                  ...at all but the most rigorous level, one<br>&gt; can construct plausible,]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Mar 13, 1997 1:55:28 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Mar 13, 1997 1:55:28 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>me@talmanl.mscd.edu</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Plausibility Arguments</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1461116&amp;tstart=0#1461116</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[I guess I can agree with what Gary and Lou are saying...  Certainly,<br>there's not much to be said for giving geometry students a jumble]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Mar 12, 1997 7:24:42 PM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Mar 12, 1997 7:24:42 PM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>alper@csli.Stanford.EDU</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Re: Plausibility Arguments</title>
        
            <link>http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1461115&amp;tstart=0#1461115</link>

        

            <description><![CDATA[I am not disagreeing with either Lou or Gary, but am asking where is the<br>role<br>of logic in all this. Is logic important or not? If it is (say]]></description>

        

            <jf:creationDate>Mar 12, 1997 11:27:33 AM</jf:creationDate>
            <jf:modificationDate>Mar 12, 1997 11:27:33 AM</jf:modificationDate>
            <jf:author>ewall@umich.edu</jf:author>
            <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
        </item>


    </channel>
</rss>

