Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/kb
List of forum topicsenRe: manual recount - of punched ballots
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1534418&tstart=0#1534418
> And machine voting was originally introduced in the last century > because of]]>Nov 20, 2000 3:14:06 PMNov 20, 2000 3:14:06 PMu091889@cic-mail.lanl.gov0Re: manual recount - of punched ballots
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1534417&tstart=0#1534417
Thom Baguley <t.s.baguley@lboro.ac.uk> wrote: >Herman Rubin]]>Nov 20, 2000 2:19:49 PMNov 20, 2000 2:19:49 PMhrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu1Re: manual recount - of punched ballots
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1534416&tstart=0#1534416
> It is not clear where the "complications" in the American > system originated, but what you]]>Nov 16, 2000 9:49:01 AMNov 16, 2000 9:49:01 AMt.s.baguley@lboro.ac.uk2Re: manual recount - of punched ballots
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1534419&tstart=0#1534419
> I don't think that ANY re-vote is pragmatically feasible.

Agreed.

Nov 16, 2000 8:06:57 AMNov 16, 2000 8:06:57 AMP.G.Hamer@nortelnetworks.com0Re: manual recount - of punched ballots
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1534414&tstart=0#1534414
Thom Baguley <t.s.baguley@lboro.ac.uk> wrote: >Bert Bishop]]>Nov 15, 2000 2:20:44 PMNov 15, 2000 2:20:44 PMhrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu0Re: manual recount - of punched ballots
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1534415&tstart=0#1534415
Thom Baguley <t.s.baguley@lboro.ac.uk> wrote: >Ron Hardin]]>Nov 15, 2000 12:37:03 PMNov 15, 2000 12:37:03 PMhrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu3Re: manual recount - of punched ballots
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1534413&tstart=0#1534413
> Thom Baguley wrote: > > > I fail to see how the]]>Nov 15, 2000 6:20:36 AMNov 15, 2000 6:20:36 AMt.s.baguley@lboro.ac.uk1Re: manual recount - of punched ballots
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1534412&tstart=0#1534412
> I fail to see how the punch card improves on this (IMO it is worse > because you simply]]>Nov 14, 2000 8:46:10 AMNov 14, 2000 8:46:10 AMbishop.11@osu.edu2Re: manual recount - of punched ballots
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1534411&tstart=0#1534411
> Rich Ulrich wrote: > > With 10,000 no-punches where only]]>Nov 14, 2000 6:52:53 AMNov 14, 2000 6:52:53 AMt.s.baguley@lboro.ac.uk7Re: manual recount - of punched ballots
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?messageID=1534410&tstart=0#1534410
> The last "official" vote-tally I heard was 288 (on CBS, from <?>), > Bush's lead]]>Nov 13, 2000 1:05:06 PMNov 13, 2000 1:05:06 PMjerry@hnrc.tufts.edu0