Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Advanced Search

Results: 157   Search Terms: "Equivalency Function"
Pages: 11 [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next ] Sort By:
 
1) Re: WM mis-explains what he means by a Binary Tree
Posted: Feb 6, 2014 7:45 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
traversal of the tree, sees the conditions of the result of the antidiagonal: not apply. This is because "the" "anti-diagonal" is always included as the end of the sweep, that the sweep has a beginning and ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
2) Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?
Posted: Jan 18, 2014 12:52 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
thinkers. Leibniz specifically has a name for this function. Obviously I frame this context as of "the equivalency function", here for that the naturals, and the reals in R[0,1], as the range of this ...

Show all results within this topic.

1%
3) Re: Is (t^2-9)/(t-3) defined at t=3?
Posted: Oct 7, 2013 8:24 PM, by: LudovicoVan
"Hetware" <hattons@speakyeasy.net> wrote in message news:lNGdnf7IAoJV1s7PnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@megapath.net... ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
4) Re: question on definitions
Posted: Aug 4, 2013 8:44 PM, by: achavanakhash@gmail.com
interpret it? If some point does not meet the initial statement, are we allowed to call the function "discontinuous" at that point? There are various definitions of continuity depending upon the particular ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
5) Re: Matheology § 265
Posted: May 14, 2013 8:10 PM, by: Graham Cooper
On May 12, 7:48 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > Matheology § 265 > > Abstract. This paper examines the possibilities of extending Cantor’s > two arguments on the uncountable nature of the ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
6) ran(EF) contains ~EF(n)
Posted: Apr 30, 2013 11:11 AM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
expansion. This is from seeing that the elements of ran(f) are the same elements of ran(REF) for REF the "reverse" equivalency function. EF: n/d REF: (d-n)/d As there exists d-n for each n and d, there ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
7) Re: Matheology § 258
Posted: Apr 27, 2013 6:47 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
On Apr 27, 3:12 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <7058d749-ce72-4a0e-9dd0-3d82f6554...@s4g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, > >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > On 27 Apr., 21: ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
8) Re: Simple analytical properties of n/d
Posted: Mar 6, 2013 12:18 AM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
On Mar 5, 7:40 am, "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 4, 8:08 pm, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> ...

Show all results within this topic.

1%
9) Re: |R| > oo
Posted: Mar 2, 2013 4:35 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
On Mar 2, 12:30 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 2, 7:28 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, March 1, 2013 9:39:31 PM UTC+1, Graham Cooper wrote: > ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
10) Re: well-ordering the reals
Posted: Jan 28, 2013 10:44 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
<fredjeffr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 28, 1:50 pm, Paul <pepste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It's often said that "you can't find an explicit well-ordering of the real numbers."  Is this just an informal way of saying ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
11) Re: How to read stackexchange.math ?
Posted: Jan 14, 2013 10:26 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
matter. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but, there are controversies in foundations like "the universe would contain itself", or, "applications aren't found in analysis due regular set-theoretical ...

Show all results within this topic.

1%
12) Re: Uncountable Diagonal Problem
Posted: Dec 31, 2012 11:05 AM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
<vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <379c8a07-1e79-42ca-93e0-494f6444a...@pp8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>, >  "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Here, I was wondering that for nested intervals ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
13) Re: Distinguishability of paths of the Infinite Binary tree???
Posted: Dec 30, 2012 7:05 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
complete ordered field with limits above and below or from left and right. Of course we know that in our "standard" reals the complete ordered field, there is not a smallest non-zero positive quantity. As ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
14) Re: Cantor's first proof in DETAILS
Posted: Nov 29, 2012 10:35 AM, by: Alan Smaill
"Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> writes: > On Nov 28, 4:58 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...@gmail.com> ...

Show all results within this topic.

3%
15) Re: Cantor's first proof in DETAILS
Posted: Nov 27, 2012 11:04 AM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
<vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <b144a62b-11a5-4397-9c0d-ecd39e274...@6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com>, >  "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 26, 12:03 pm, Virgil ...

Show all results within this topic.

3%
Pages: 11 [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next ]

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.