Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Advanced Search

Results: 161   Search Terms: "Equivalency Function"
Pages: 11 [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next ] Sort By:
 
1) Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???
Posted: Sep 2, 2014 8:58 AM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
ZG, "concomitant"'s definition here is "from both each together". And, the line-drawing function there ...

Show all results within this topic.

3%
2) Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers
Posted: Aug 29, 2014 10:03 AM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
This is defined in quite thorough detail as the natural/unit equivalency function: EF. empty <-> full Frank Ernest Finlayson ...

Show all results within this topic.

7%
3) Re: bounded sequence or not ?
Posted: Jul 1, 2014 2:53 AM, by: troisquatorze
I don't know if it can be useful to anyone but I can prove that the problem is equivalent to: "Is the function X->Integrate({sqrt(t)}sin(t)dt,0,X) bounded on R+ " where {sqrt(t)} denotes the fractional ...

Show all results within this topic.

5%
4) Re: WM's arrogant errors!
Posted: May 13, 2014 12:58 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
to change the premise. > > Many matheologians try to solve this problem by introducing undefinable "reals" which cannot appear in mathematical discourse, dialogue, monologue. But this step does not help, ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
5) Re: § 473 Thomas Jech on Potential
and Actual Infinity

Posted: Apr 24, 2014 9:27 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
subsets of |N. > > >> making the set >> of definitions uncountable. > > What does that mean? Every "uncountability proof" assumes the existence of all natural numbers, bijects them with a set, and subsequently ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
6) Re: § 476 Detlef Laugwitz on Potential an
d Actual Infinity

Posted: Apr 21, 2014 8:16 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
On 4/19/2014 5:23 AM, "Jürgen R." wrote: > You are missing the point: The diagonalization argument, applied to your > purportedly ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
7) Re: WM mis-explains what he means by a Binary Tree
Posted: Feb 6, 2014 7:45 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
traversal of the tree, sees the conditions of the result of the antidiagonal: not apply. This is because "the" "anti-diagonal" is always included as the end of the sweep, that the sweep has a beginning and ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
8) Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?
Posted: Jan 18, 2014 12:52 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
thinkers. Leibniz specifically has a name for this function. Obviously I frame this context as of "the equivalency function", here for that the naturals, and the reals in R[0,1], as the range of this ...

Show all results within this topic.

1%
9) Re: Is (t^2-9)/(t-3) defined at t=3?
Posted: Oct 7, 2013 8:24 PM, by: LudovicoVan
"Hetware" <hattons@speakyeasy.net> wrote in message news:lNGdnf7IAoJV1s7PnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@megapath.net... ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
10) Re: question on definitions
Posted: Aug 4, 2013 8:44 PM, by: achavanakhash@gmail.com
interpret it? If some point does not meet the initial statement, are we allowed to call the function "discontinuous" at that point? There are various definitions of continuity depending upon the particular ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
11) Re: Matheology § 265
Posted: May 14, 2013 8:10 PM, by: Graham Cooper
On May 12, 7:48 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > Matheology § 265 > > Abstract. This paper examines the possibilities of extending Cantor’s > two arguments on the uncountable nature of the ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
12) ran(EF) contains ~EF(n)
Posted: Apr 30, 2013 11:11 AM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
expansion. This is from seeing that the elements of ran(f) are the same elements of ran(REF) for REF the "reverse" equivalency function. EF: n/d REF: (d-n)/d As there exists d-n for each n and d, there ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
13) Re: Matheology § 258
Posted: Apr 27, 2013 6:47 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
On Apr 27, 3:12 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <7058d749-ce72-4a0e-9dd0-3d82f6554...@s4g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, > >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > On 27 Apr., 21: ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
14) Re: Simple analytical properties of n/d
Posted: Mar 6, 2013 12:18 AM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
On Mar 5, 7:40 am, "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 4, 8:08 pm, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> ...

Show all results within this topic.

1%
15) Re: |R| > oo
Posted: Mar 2, 2013 4:35 PM, by: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
On Mar 2, 12:30 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 2, 7:28 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, March 1, 2013 9:39:31 PM UTC+1, Graham Cooper wrote: > ...

Show all results within this topic.

2%
Pages: 11 [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next ]

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.