Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » FredJeffrie_@_mail.com

Advanced Search

 
Most relevant results by forum
 
Results: 203
Pages: 14 [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14 | Next ]  
 
Results from sci.math
Show all results within this discussion.

1) Re: "one-to-one correspondence"(bijection) and the size of two
infinite sets

Posted: Sep 24, 2016 2:36 PM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
2) Re: Source of quote needed
Posted: Sep 22, 2016 12:14 PM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
3) Re: Pedagogy q.
Posted: Sep 18, 2016 11:10 AM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
4) Re: WM is wrong!, again!!, as usual!!!
Posted: Sep 10, 2016 10:52 AM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
5) Re: Ping FredJeffries
Posted: Sep 9, 2016 9:50 PM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
6) Re: I do not understand infinity. I never have and I am not so sure I
ever shall...

Posted: Sep 4, 2016 1:52 PM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
7) Re: Peano axioms and addition function: Constructing the backbone of
numbers (BBN).

Posted: Sep 4, 2016 11:44 AM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
8) Re: Poll.
Posted: Sep 3, 2016 4:48 PM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
9) I Concede
Posted: Sep 2, 2016 2:46 PM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
10) Re: Re-learn math at the age of 50?
Posted: Aug 30, 2016 2:53 PM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
11) Workshop on Potential Infinity
Posted: Aug 29, 2016 8:00 AM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
12) Re: Limits of sequences of sets
Posted: Aug 26, 2016 11:49 AM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
13) Re: A definition of the set of prime numbers without reference to the
natural numbers?

Posted: Aug 25, 2016 10:51 PM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
14) Re: Simplest proof that 0 999 is not well defined as being equal to 1.
Posted: Aug 21, 2016 10:36 PM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
15) Re: Simplest proof that 0 999 is not well defined as being equal to 1.
Posted: Aug 21, 2016 8:43 PM, by: FredJeffries@gmail.com

Show all results within this topic.

100%
Pages: 14 [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14 | Next ]

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2016. All Rights Reserved.