Some subscribers to Math-Teach might be interested in a recent post "Responses to David Klahr's Criticism of Inquiry Science" [Hake (2013)].  The abstract reads:

ABSTRACT: David Klahr's (2012) APS News back-page essay "Inquiry Science rocks: Or does it?" at <> initiated two long threads on the PhysLrnR list: (a) "Klahr in Dec. APSNEWS" at <>, and (b) "Klahr In APS" at <> [respectively 51 and 67 posts as of 17 Feb 2013; to gain access you may need to obtain a password by clicking on "Log in required" and then typing your email address into a slot].

Unfortunately, none of these posts addressed Joe Bellina's lead question at <>: "HAS ANYONE THOUGHT OF RESPONDING?" [My CAPS.]
Thus far the only response in APS News to Klahr (2012) is a letter in the Feb 2013 issue "Criticism of Inquiry-based Learning Strikes Home" at <> from physicist Robert Ehrlich (2013)], which supports Klahr's criticism of Inquiry Science. Ehrlich <> is an inveterate Physics Education Research (PER) basher - see e.g., my response to his careless commentary in "Comment on 'How do we know if we are doing a good job in physics teaching' by Robert Ehrlich" [Hake (2002)] at <>.

To access the complete 14 kB post please click on <>.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: <>
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: <>
Academia: <>
Blog: <>
GooglePlus: <>
Google Scholar  <>
Twitter: <>
Facebook: <>

REFERENCES [URL shortened by and accessed on 18 Feb 2013.]
Hake, R.R. 2013. "Responses to David Klahr's Criticism of Inquiry Science,"
online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at <>. Post of 17 Feb 2013 16:13:16-0800  to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists and are also on my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at <> with a provision for comments.