Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Hammick's Law of Thread Decay
Replies:
2
Last Post:
Jun 20, 2006 6:59 AM




Re: Hammick's Law of Thread Decay
Posted:
Jun 20, 2006 6:59 AM


On 20 Jun 2006 01:47:24 0700, "Larry Lard" <larrylard@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Larry Hammick wrote: >> "As the number of responses approaches infinity, the content of the >> thread converges to a limit which is independant of the original >> topic." > >No, I don't think this is true (or what you mean). As threads get >longer the content doesn't *converge* to anything  it's not the case >that by the end of a 10,000post thread, all posts are on exactly the >same topic. I think what you want is: > >As the number of responses increases, the distance of the content from >the original topic is nondecreasing
I think this is too broad, as it would imply that once the thread gets long enough it will cover topics arbitrarily distant from the original topic. That doesn't really happen in sci.math. Either the thread dies, becomes an exchange between two people only, or mutates into one of the crank topics. It would be interesting to find out what are the basins of attraction.



