The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Hammick's Law of Thread Decay
Replies: 2   Last Post: Jun 20, 2006 6:59 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Toni Lassila

Posts: 536
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Hammick's Law of Thread Decay
Posted: Jun 20, 2006 6:59 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 20 Jun 2006 01:47:24 -0700, "Larry Lard" <>

>Larry Hammick wrote:
>> "As the number of responses approaches infinity, the content of the
>> thread converges to a limit which is independant of the original
>> topic."

>No, I don't think this is true (or what you mean). As threads get
>longer the content doesn't *converge* to anything - it's not the case
>that by the end of a 10,000-post thread, all posts are on exactly the
>same topic. I think what you want is:
>As the number of responses increases, the distance of the content from
>the original topic is non-decreasing

I think this is too broad, as it would imply that once the thread gets
long enough it will cover topics arbitrarily distant from the original
topic. That doesn't really happen in sci.math. Either the thread dies,
becomes an exchange between two people only, or mutates into one of
the crank topics. It would be interesting to find out what are the
basins of attraction.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.