
Re: Primitive Pythagorean Triplets
Posted:
Sep 27, 2017 4:27 PM


tirsdag 26. september 2017 11.14.18 UTC+2 skrev bassam king karzeddin følgende: > On Sunday, September 24, 2017 at 7:17:00 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > > On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 5:50:05 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > > > Why it is impossible to find a single primitive Pythagorean triplet (in positive integers) being with all terms as powerful numbers? > > > > > > Regards > > > Bassam King Karzeddin > > > > Just imagine how little and how so tiny and how unnoticeable is the world of mathematicians for sure > > > > A new theorem had been stated since a long time, not a single professional historian could claim older sources nor a single genius mathematician could also refute it, but still, doesn't count to be adopted by any mathematical establishment, especially that it is published in a Usenet as sci.math > > > > As if the word publish means only in a Journals, (not learning any lesson from > > the history) > > But just imagine if this (half line theorem without a single mathematical notation) was announced by a top known genius mathematician or an alleged top (Journal or University), then how the mathematical press would immediately act with so much music and so many analysis with especially those many so professional talents that acquire very long tongues and deepest throats (that are good for something else) > > > > So where are they hiding now from this simplest challenge? wonder! > > > > Don't we live in an era of supercomputers also? wonder! > > > > I also announced a modest prize for you genius mathematicians > > > > Is it your so negligible and so unnoticeable dignity that make you pretend to be deaf and so blind? wonder! > > > > Or is it the inherited dishonesty that the vast majority of the professional mathematicians acquire? no wonder! > > > > Aren't you so shameful of your little selfbeing as real traitors to the science that feeds, drinks, and cloths you? wonder! > > > > Or is it that your inferiority complex that makes you have hated a lot of real challenges for the sake of making easy baseless maths based on nonexisting concepts as many as here (infinities, epsilon, delta, Approximations, famous meaningless cut, Average, endless sequences, ...etc), wonder! > > > > So, if this is the case then you really don't need to worry at all, because you are dancing alone in the dark > > > > And just imagine the football world where a little boy only scores a goal of a win in a competitive football match, then see how the whole world firstpage coloured photos in newspapers, in the world press, in every TV station, ... etc > > > > Just compare yourself and certainly, you would find yourself facing a mirror mathematicians, but wait and don't break the mirror... > > > > And I was only comparing you with a class of another little category, and there are much higher categories for sure > > > > But why all this is happening with a class of people who generally think that they were born genius and very distinct from others, but the fact is really shocking, but why? > > > > It is because mathematicians had been deceived and upsetminded for so many centuries by now for the sake of worshipping some few devils that mislead them globally, otherwise, if true mathematicians are sufficient number, then they would never accept to be less than the top leaders of this mad world that are generally governed by mad people who can't even comprehend a simplest theorem like the Pythagorean even you assign the best teachers for them for all their lives, and they will destroy the world over your heads for sure > > > > Just look and listen carefully around, but those helpless wouldn't change their inevitable destiny unless they learn the biggest unforgottable lesson for sure > > > > BKK > > And observe carefully here the complete absence in this thread of few wellknown TROLLS (at least in sci.math ? Google) as (Dan, Jan, Markus, Zelos, ? and other so strange forgotten creatures), where at the same time they, they usually do appear very often in my other threads in many much less talkative topics than real challenging mathematics as number theory where generally any mathematician can say repeatedly anything that he learnt blindly from books > > I really wonder about those incomprehensible characters > > And I know that they would run away and hide immediately once they read the first line, and not because they don?t understand any big issue in mathematics, but certainly because they have no word to add here, and they would be so glad if anyone could prove me wrong, and they would immediately appear in this case > But here in such area, there isn?t any hope for anyone to turn it down (for sure) > > And not because that I can?t prove it, of course, I can and (so easily), but my real intention is to make my Theorems (which seem only as Conjectures for you all) as a suitable and permanent curse and real punishment for such common typo mathematicians in the era of free word internet publishing, which will soon invade and throw away the official traditional publishing as peerreviewed > > Noting that, if the wellknown Euler?s (sum of powers wrong conjecture) was only announced today then most likely it will be refuted in the same day mainly due to computer engineers and mathematicians programmers, but that actually took few centuries to be refuted > > Ref. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_sum_of_powers_conjecture > > I also challenge all those (themselves) called world Peerreviewed (Top Journals and Universities) to prove me wrong in any of my PUBLISHED theorems > > In fact, I want to make a great fun of them mainly for school students and another nonprofessionalmathematicians, especially for footballers and in the best area they feel so proud (for sure) > > Regards > Bassam King Karzeddin > Sep. 26, 2017
The answer is so easy that non here has thought you were serious. It is not solved. If you have a solution; give it.
KON

