The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: looking for a trig proof
Replies: 4   Last Post: Mar 23, 2017 9:23 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Wally W.

Posts: 283
Registered: 6/15/11
Re: looking for a trig proof
Posted: Mar 23, 2017 8:52 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:54:12 -0700, William Elliot wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, James Waldby wrote:

>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:55:22 +0000, Popping mad wrote:

>> > A = x cos? + y sin?
>> >
>> > Has anyone seen the proof for this
>> > for a line. I ran across it in the Hough Transform as a parameterized
>> > version for the definition of a line

>> I don't know just what you mean by the "for a line" phrase,

>Yes, fadish speedthink is incoherent.
>The equation of a line in the xy plane is
> ax + by = c.
>Dividing through by sqr(a^2 + b^2) gives the form
> x.sin t + y.cos t = d.

Which can be written as:

y = d / cos(t) - x * tan(t)

Why does parameterizing help?

>> but if, for example, your rho is the length of the hypotenuse
>> of a right triangle with horizontal side length x and vertical
>> side length y, then x = rho cos theta, y = rho sin theta,
>> whence x cos theta + y sin theta = rho cos^2 theta + rho sin^2 theta
>> which equals rho because cos^2 theta + sin^2 theta = 1.

>There was no rho in his equation.
>News groups are plain text only.
>Control characters don't show correctly to everybody.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.