The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3
= 0.333...

Replies: 9   Last Post: Oct 2, 2017 8:32 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mitchrae3323@gmail.com

Posts: 111
Registered: 9/12/17
Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3
= 0.333...

Posted: Oct 2, 2017 8:32 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 1:58:04 PM UTC-7, Me wrote:
> On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 10:47:08 PM UTC+2, burs...@gmail.com wrote:
>

> > But Netzweltler's are of interest, since they might show
> > some very juvenile believes, maybe even not their own,
> > just some mish mash from dunno where, maybe from the land of Oz?

>
> The problem with "Netzweltler" (as you will soon find out for yourself, I guess) is that he suffices the original definition of a crank:
>
> "A crank is defined as a man who cannot be turned." (Nature, 8 Nov 1906, 25/2)


I don't buy that. Who establishes the truth. I won't turn to
the Status Quo.

Mitchell Raemsch



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.