The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » mathedcc

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Required Statistical Literacy Course for All Students?
Replies: 1   Last Post: Apr 19, 2010 6:15 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jonathan Groves

Posts: 2,068
From: Kaplan University, Argosy University, Florida Institute of Technology
Registered: 8/18/05
Required Statistical Literacy Course for All Students?
Posted: Apr 14, 2010 12:06 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Dear All,

I was responding to a post by Jerry P. Becker titled "Education Data More
Confusing Than Enlightening," and I had reached the following conclusion
(as quoted directly from my response):

I agree with Rich Wenning's comment, which is quoted in this article.
Data can be easily manipulated to prevent schools from being punished
according to the rules of NCLB. And such data manipulation is hard for
most people to detect since many people do not have the required background
in statistical reasoning and how statistics is often misused or abused
to detect these problems.

When I think about this, I now realize that one major fault with teacher education
is the lack of required statistics courses to help them understand statistics and
how it is used. How can we expect teachers to make sense of various studies and
data in education to help them improve their teaching if they themselves lack the
required background to make sense of this stuff? How can we expect teachers to
speak out against principals and other adminstrators from purposefully
abusing statistics if they themselves do not have the expertise to detect
such crap? Just because certain teachers aren't expected to teach something
like that doesn't mean they don't need to know it. Otherwise, we could justify
taking the math out of engineering simply because engineers are not in general
expected to teach math.

When I think about it, a required statistical literacy course of some sort for
all college students (and probably for high school students as well) is a great idea.
Some colleges do this, but many do not. The lack of such a universal requirement
keeps the public at large in the dark when statistics is purposefully abused
to suit certain people's purposes rather than used to arrive at the truth.

I especially want to focus on the last paragraph though I included the two
previous paragraphs to help you see where I am coming from. I had written
previously about how the lack of a calculus prerequisite for statistics
bothers me some, and it still does at least somewhat. Regardless of career,
a person needs some knowledge of statiscal literacy to be able to make sense of
reports about statistical studies and to detect misuses or abuses of statistics.
SUch skills will serve anyone well, regardless of the person's career. The lack
of basic statistical literacy among the public at large means that many people are
fleeced all the time by statistical studies that don't mean anything. Most
people would not have a chance to develop these skills if calculus is required
for a beginning statistics course, and calculus is not needed to develop such
skills anyway. Finally, it does little good for a person to know all these
fancy tools and the theory behind statistics but then cannot detect abuses
or misuses of statistics and cannot use statistics intelligently. I'd much
rather see a person who can use statistics intelligently who does not understand
much of the theory and justification behind statistics than see someone
who knows much of theory behind statistics but cannot use statistics intelligently.

Jonathan Groves

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.