Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: The golden angle 137.507, pi, phi and positive integer 1728
Posted:
Apr 26, 2004 8:36 PM


Okay, more specific:
Pi is NOT 3.14164078... using a different equation will only change it if the equation is wrong.
Also, You cannot get 360.00551... degrees into a circle (at least not on a 2d plane. You define a degree by taking a circle and dividing it by 360 exactly.
I cannot comment on the rest of your page as I could not follow the rambling.
I will not give you my name because you might be the kind of person that sends letter bombs to people who dissagree with you.
On 24 Apr 04 21:30:17 0400 (EDT), Anonymous wrote: >On 23 Apr 04 13:44:35 0400 (EDT), I don't want you to know wrote: >>I'm sorry. You are wrong. >> > >Ok, please what is your name? > >Would you like to expand on the "you are wrong" part. > > >>If you tell me you've discovered something unknown in mathematics, > > >I have posted my reconciliations, yes my work: > > >Can you show me where in the last three hundred years, where an >equation has been used like mine on 1728 to give an inverse value for >a positive number? > >Many famous mathematicians have used 1728 (jinvarient) but I have >uesd something new to explained this positive integer 1728. > >Annals of Mathematics, 149 (1999), 10791086 (1932) > ><a href="http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/557034.html">http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/557034.html
> > > I >>say " Cool, tell me about it." But, When you say you are right and >the >>best mathematicians of the last two centuries are wrong about >>something as fundamental as pi, > > >I just don't know what to make out of what you are saying. You seem to >be upset but not mentioning what about. Can you give some examples of >where I have said I am right. > >I say " You are wrong" >>I highly recommend rechecking your calculations. > >About what? >Which calculations? > >Could you be more specific my work is resonably extensive. > >And I have been complimented for my reconciliation attempts, >I don't mind you saying I am wrong, in fact I thank you for your >response, but please let it be somewhat constructive. > >Regards > >> >>On 23 Apr 04 01:05:25 0400 (EDT), Anonymous wrote: >>>The golden angle 137.507, pi, phi and positive integer 1728 >>> >>>Hi! >>> >>>my outcomes for pi, phi and positive integer 1728 >>> >>>hope they are of interest to you. >>> >>><a >>href="http://www.vorpublishing.com/the_golden_angle_pi_phi_and_1728_by_kevin_trinder.html"><a href="http://www.vorpublishing.com/the_golden_angle_pi_phi_and_1728_by_kevin_trinder.html">http://www.vorpublishing.com/the_golden_angle_pi_phi_and_1728_by_kevin_trinder.html
>> >>> >>>Regards



