Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Helpppp!!!
Replies: 9   Last Post: May 18, 2001 7:48 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ] Topics: [ Previous | Next ]
 Joseph Buczek Posts: 2 Registered: 12/20/04
Areas of Mathematical Thinking
Posted: Jun 13, 2000 5:28 PM

People have made a viable K-12 curriculum but the one's in power won't
let it be. You can't give it away!

Firstly, the teachers from the 50's knew what the basic curriculum for
k-8 should be - it was just what they were teaching. Yes, there were
many things missing, like how to handle your finances and pick stocks.
But, essentially they taught you what a sentence was and how to write
a complete composition, or essay. They taught you basic arithmetic,
algebraic operations, how to solve equations, etc. they taught you
history, geography, etc., etc.

As I see it nobody back then really knew what a sentence really was
(They told it was a group of word that expresses a complete thought)
-it took me thirty years to find out the real meaning of a sentence.
They told me that a polynomial is an algebraic expression that is
rational and integral in the literals. I didn't know what they were
talking about. I now know that the teachers didn't know, either. No,
the teachers were telling the kids things they read in a book, but
didn't understand. The problem with the education system today is
based upon the fact that teachers had jobs whether they knew the
material or not. The principal never went into the class room to find
out if the teacher knew what he was talking about or not. So, who
suffered? It was us kids. How? Well, I had to rummage through the
books in libraries until I found that every book was a copy of other
books before it. Not one book I ever ran through had an explanation
of what a polynomial is and why you need one. The book writing
business is pathetic in this country, actually, its pathetic all over
the world. Well you've heard it and I know that I am right.
Why should teachers learn what a polynomial is. They still get paid
whether they know what it is or not.

Now I learned what a sentence is, what an essay is, and what a
polynomial is by intense perseverance. All without pay. That's the
answer. Alexander Pope said that nothing great has been ever achieved
where there was a want for money. Thats it. Money, money, money is
the reason why our education system is so bad. Everybody is writing a
book by copying somebody else. And, the teachers are only teaching
from the books. This is called rote learning. It is only a
repetition of what is in a book. Real learning through genuine
understanding is gained through dedicated analysis of a problem
motivated by genuine interest in educational things.

The "math wars" between California and the NCMT are sparked by real
mathematicians, people who broke their backs to understand math
concepts like differential equations, Green's functions, Legendre
polynomials, hyperspaces, hypergeometric functions, matrix theory,
curl, divergence, etc. These are all topics that were discovered
because the great master had the problem by the seat of the pants and
understood all aspects of them. I defy one person to tell me what a
Green's function is in plain words. There is nobody. I wanted to
know what one was since the 60's and never was able to find out.
Finally, I figured it out. Recently, I contacted the University of
Nottingham for information on the Green's function and they sent me a
reply stating that "Based on what you have told us you know more about
the Green's function than we do and we would look to your help. So,
the root of the problem is: let the experts develop the curricula for
the high school students, not the graduates of teacher's colleges who
know about as much about what a polynomial is as I did when I came out
of high school in September 1950.

Date Subject Author
11/28/98 Gary Boyle-Holmes
2/1/99 Newton Leibniz
2/1/99 Jack Jersawitz
2/2/99 Newton Leibniz
2/2/99 Jack Jersawitz
2/2/99 Victor Steinbok
6/13/00 Joseph Buczek
1/24/01 Lori Gedwillo
1/24/01 Larry L. Hatfield
5/18/01 A. Tutor