The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.research

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Concretizable categories
Replies: 9   Last Post: Apr 11, 2006 10:30 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Tobias Fritz

Posts: 9
Registered: 9/21/05
Re: Concretizable categories
Posted: Apr 6, 2006 9:02 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

> Or, to ask a simpler question to start with: is every finite category
> concret(izabl)e?


As a start, we know that every finite *group* is concretizable, that
is: it is a subgroup of some permutation group.

Now we can make a similar argument for a finite category C; we will
construct a faithful functor F:C-->FinSet. Given an object
A, define F(A) to be the set of all morphisms in C with codomain A. Given
a morphism
f:A-->B, define F(f) to be the function F(A)-->F(B) that is just
composition with f.

Now if f,g:A-->B are two different morphisms, the funtions F(f) and F(g)
are also different: evaluate the functions at the identity of A:

F(f)(id_A) = f*id_A = f
F(g)(id_A) = g*id_A = g

So F is indeed faithful.

Clearly this argument is just an elaboration of the finite group


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.