Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Concretizable categories
Replies: 9   Last Post: Apr 11, 2006 10:30 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Tobias Fritz Posts: 9 Registered: 9/21/05
Re: Concretizable categories
Posted: Apr 6, 2006 9:02 PM

>
> concret(izabl)e?
>

Yes.

As a start, we know that every finite *group* is concretizable, that
is: it is a subgroup of some permutation group.

Now we can make a similar argument for a finite category C; we will
construct a faithful functor F:C-->FinSet. Given an object
A, define F(A) to be the set of all morphisms in C with codomain A. Given
a morphism
f:A-->B, define F(f) to be the function F(A)-->F(B) that is just
composition with f.

Now if f,g:A-->B are two different morphisms, the funtions F(f) and F(g)
are also different: evaluate the functions at the identity of A:

F(f)(id_A) = f*id_A = f
F(g)(id_A) = g*id_A = g

So F is indeed faithful.

Clearly this argument is just an elaboration of the finite group
statement.

HTH,
Tobias

Date Subject Author
4/5/06 Jamie Vicary
4/5/06 Jonathan Scott
4/5/06 Nath Rao
4/6/06 Colin McLarty