Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: 9.- Characterizing primes.
Posted:
Sep 24, 2007 5:56 PM
|
|
Brian Quincy Hutchings wrote:
> why don't you just repost the definition, then,
> to clear-up this little problem?... I mean,
> no-one at the googolplex is going to censor you, if
> they can't know what you're saying
> with your Happy Fingers.
>
> I may not be much of a numbertheorist, but
> I did solve "Platform Nine and Three-quarters!"
>
> others, like AP, are beyond any criticism of their
> language
> -- the God-am Theory is just too *good*.
>
> > > > Google DELETES my posts here! Go to
> www.ghostNASA.com>>>
> >
> > I also have some suspicions.
>
> thus:
> flattery is good!... look at Uncle Al's site,
> to see some of his experiments;
> what experiments have you planned
> in the Omnideterministic Totalosity --
> any results to report?
>
> I have not done any experiments,
> that don't involve everyday household materials ...
> other than Drain-o (tm).
>
> the main problem is that you are illiterate
> in *both* German and English; dig it?
>
> if you can't "get" Shakespeare,
> you don't really know English. Schiller'd
> be my factotum for German (fortunately,
> several volumes have been translated into English;
> see http://www.schillerinstitute.org/ .)
>
> Baez is a good expositor, EFL grad, and
> he seems to know his math; however,
> most of it's way beyond me -- but
> I wouldn't hesitate to use it as a reference, if
> I didn't have a book or article in mind.
>
> > And from what I gather is that Hutchings is also a
> Wikipedia editor
> > related to Loadmaster.
> >
> > So, those who have been dis-sed by Uncle Al for the
> past decades, try
> > looking up Hutchings first
> > before looking up some decoy or dead end of a Alan
> Schwartz.
> >
> > One of the purposes of the computer set up was to
> introduce a stupid
> > and fake theory of gravity
> > calling it Uncle Al's input. But it was probably
> mostly John Baez's
> > silly physics notions cobbled
> > together and so he did not want to look silly by
> signing his own name
> > to the contraption so he
> > had Uncle Al submit it in the computer artificial
> intelligence, and
> > at least that is my take, speculative
> > or not on the situation.
>
> thus:
> now, this is a beautifully historical writing by
> Weber,
> on electrodynamics -- a true "source document,"
> to compare to the typical textbook account:
> http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202007/
> Weber_1846.pdf
>
> --Trickier Dick wants you in Darfur,
> according to Jon Prendergast, Don Cheadle,
> the PRC, the UN and Tony Blair;
> do you feel a computerized draft?
>
> --mortgage bailout will fail:
> http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2007/lar_pac/070903lar_f
> irewall_works.html
>
> --Fox promotes Cheeny Admin. war with Iran:
> http://larouchepub.com/other/2007/3437fox_poop_cheney.
> html
>
> --14 Italian Senators Call for Cheney Impeachment
> Aug. 1, 2007 (EIRNS)-
> The Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee
> (LPAC) issued the following release today.
> Fourteen members of the Italian Senate have signed a
> call "to the
> Members of Congress to support Rep. Kucinich's House
> Resolution 333
> for the Impeachment of Dick Cheney."
> http://larouchepub.com/pr/2007/070801italian_senators_
> call.html
>
Ummmh, well, well. I propose you something. Why don`t you
go step by step begining at the "begining" ?
I mean, I've only used axioms, modus ponens and universally
accepted mathematical tools. For example, I don't give a new
name to the derivative of a function, I only give names to new
concepts combining others already defined.
Thus,
As you know the link of my complete paper, why don't we start with
1.1.1 Definition?. If you take your time, who knows ?. Perhaps we' ll
be famous. But if you give up, I 'll understand.
Fernando.
P.S. You don't need to be a number theorist for understanding the
paper, I've created a new theory based in thousand, thousand,...,
thousand hours of sincere and freely chosen mathematical intellectual
liberty. Some day, I'll tell you my strange and unsocial status.
|
|
|
|
