Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: The Greatest Genius of All Times Arindumb
Replies: 3   Last Post: Mar 25, 2012 2:20 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Romanise

Posts: 106
Registered: 6/18/08
The Greatest Genius of All Times Arindumb
Posted: Mar 25, 2012 9:11 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Mar 25, 10:10 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> On Mar 23, 6:22 pm, use...@mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jai Maharaj) wrote:

> > In article <a5f791e8-cb5c-4e9e-bde2-10b423ec3...@t6g2000pba.googlegroups.com>,
> >  Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> posted:

>
> > > Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > > > In article <deefd822-ce69-4d06-aa17-1bb029209...@mq9g2000pbb.googlegroups=
> > > ..com>,
> > > > =A0Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> posted:
>
> > > > > On Mar 23, 9:54=3DA0am, use...@mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr.
> > > > > Jai Maharaj) wrote:

> > > > > > In article <dc9d6ca8-4291-4127-a286-5cd01ff04...@vy9g2000pbc.googlegr=
> > > oups=3D
> > > > > ..com>,
> > > > > > =3DA0Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> posted:
>
> > > > > > > On Mar 23, 12:03=3D3DA0am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> =
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thursday, 22 March 2012 20:53:55 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee =3D3=
> > > DA0wro=3D
> > > > > te:
> > > > > > > > > On Mar 22, 7:57=3D3DA0pm, use...@mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.co=
> > > m/jai(=3D
> > > > > Dr.
> > > > > > > > > Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > In article <3244b998-51e5-402d-874e-3f8ec8f7b...@lf20g2000pbb=
> > > ..goo=3D
> > > > > gleg=3D3D
> > > > > > > roups.com>,
> > > > > > > > > > =3D3DA0Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> posted:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > In article <4ed05a4a-55e2-408c-b810-737949523...@ow8g2000=
> > > pbc.=3D
> > > > > goog=3D3D
> > > > > > > legroups.com>,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> posted:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 21, 9:13=3D3D3D3DA0am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1..=
> > > ..@bigp=3D
> > > > > ond.co=3D3D
> > > > > > > m> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 20, 11:15=3D3D3D3DA0pm, DMJoshi <josh...@gmail=
> > > ..com> =3D
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 20, 10:28=3D3D3D3DA0am, Arindam Banerjee <ad=
> > > da1...=3D
> > > > > @bigpo=3D3D
> > > > > > > nd.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From such constant embarrassments to humanity as =
> > > thos=3D
> > > > > e Ja=3D3D
> > > > > > > i describes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as the goon squad - of which the k-mqw the cttc s=
> > > e is=3D
> > > > > =A0the=3D3D
> > > > > > > =3DA0rudest pest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > topping even Joshiji.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You "greatest genius of all times" called parents o=
> > > f mo=3D
> > > > > st s=3D3D
> > > > > > > uccessful
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Indian boys amoeba.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > No one can help the fact that you are a fool with no =
> > > sens=3D
> > > > > e of=3D3D
> > > > > > > =3DA0humour,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joshiji. =3D3D3D3DA0btw this is the last thing I writ=
> > > e to y=3D
> > > > > ou.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandi) Banerjee, greatest g=
> > > eniu=3D
> > > > > s of=3D3D
> > > > > > > =3DA0all
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > time, sole god among lotsa devils.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > And of course, all wise people will understand perfectl=
> > > y we=3D
> > > > > ll w=3D3D
> > > > > > > hy
> > > > > > > > > > > > > proven fools with low vulgar mentality need to be shunn=
> > > ed. =3D
> > > > > =3D3D3DA=3D3D
> > > > > > > 0Indeed, it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > would be stupid to deal with them.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yes indeed.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > > > > > > > > > > > Om Shanti

>
> > > > > > > > > > > So I don't deal with them, after finding out how incorrigib=
> > > le t=3D
> > > > > hey
> > > > > > > > > > > are. =3D3DA0No decent chap can blame me for that.
>
> > > > > > > > > > No, not at all. Exposing terrorists and not dealing with
> > > > > > > > > > them directly, but making their terrorism ineffective
> > > > > > > > > > does work in most cases.

>
> > > > > > > > > > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > > > > > > > > > Om Shanti

>
> > > > > > > > > True. =3D3DA0The terrorist needs a mass base. That is based upo=
> > > n feed=3D
> > > > > ing the
> > > > > > > > > masses perceived or real wrongs, and hopes of redemption. =3D3D=
> > > A0In o=3D
> > > > > ther
> > > > > > > > > words, there is an ideological dimension to terrorism. =3D3DA0W=
> > > hen th=3D
> > > > > e
> > > > > > > > > ideological base of the terrorist/fraud/goon is demolished, the
> > > > > > > > > terrorist loses popular support and his terrorism then will be =

> > > base=3D
> > > > > d
> > > > > > > > > upon pure cussedness. =3D3DA0The notion of working for higher g=
> > > oals t=3D
> > > > > han his
> > > > > > > > > own perverted ego, will thus not have any basis. =3D3DA0Not tha=
> > > t one =3D
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > underestimate the terrorist's capacity for self-delusion.
>
> > > > > > > > Nor ongoing examples of petty cunning and unscrupulousness.
> > > > > > > > In my new physics sense, where all radiation is from dipoles, the=

> > >  goo=3D
> > > > > ns a=3D3D
> > > > > > > re as
> > > > > > > > much a must as the good guys. =3D3DA0They constitute the other po=
> > > le of =3D
> > > > > the so=3D3D
> > > > > > > cial dipole.
> > > > > > > > Thinking of them as such, that they gotta exist, we reach a level=
> > >  of =3D
> > > > > equa=3D3D
> > > > > > > namity.
> > > > > > > > The conflict between the gods and the demons, is present in all H=
> > > indu=3D
> > > > > =A0myt=3D3D
> > > > > > > hology.
>
> > > > > > > Envy of the gods is the chief characteristic of the demon. =3DA0Dem=
> > > ons
> > > > > > > also have more passion the the gods, so there are very many demons.
> > > > > > > Lack of principles, bad
> > > > > > > manners, moral instability, lack of originality, all lead to their
> > > > > > > doing evil. =3DA0But they do have unity and a high level of cunning=

> > > ..
> > > > > > > Their unity and unscrupulousness
> > > > > > > make them victorious from time to time. =3DA0But, despite all the e=

> > > vil
> > > > > > > they do, the demons still think what they are doing is right.
>
> > > > > > > It is not that demons do not have any appeal. =3DA0But to learn mor=
> > > e abou=3D
> > > > > t
> > > > > > > them, chaps gotta buy my first book that should be published soon..=
> > > ..
>
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Arindam Banerjee

>
> > > > > > Self-publishing?
>
> > > > > > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > > > > > Om Shanti

>
> > > > > Yes. I will give that a try.
>
> > > > I did find a book/booklet posted by you some years ago.
>
> > > > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > > > Om Shanti

>
> > > That should have been "To the Stars!".  It is was too advanced for its
> > > time.  I wrote it to raise money for my work, but could not get that
> > > published.  In those
> > > days self-publication was very expensive.  Dorrance was asking nearly
> > > $10000.  I put it up in my website, but that site has vanished some
> > > time ago.  It
> > > was there on that site for quite a few years.

>
> > Yes, that's the one. I found it on some site during the
> > research for my screenplay. Will you re-publish it
> > formally?

>
> Thanks for remembering it.  Yes, I will publish it in due course,
> after I have completed my experiments and proved the theories.  I will
> add to that, bring
> it up to date.


Whatever Monkey Maharaj is referring to, did you not unload it on
Usenet?

Is there any place other than Usent that you are considering to
publish your experimentally proven theories?

You were abusing Einstein on the basis of your theories
experimentally unproven?




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.