Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re: SCI.LOGIC is a STAGNANT CESS PITT of LOSERS!
Posted:
Nov 17, 2012 4:34 PM


On Nov 18, 7:11 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote: > > See this is the problem. > > > You just BAFFLE WITH BULLSHIT every assertion made that doesn't match > > your Library Of Logic Facts! > > .... > ..... > ..... > > > *IF* you had any credible mathematical capacity, > > you would ACKNOWLEDGE THE ARGUMENT FIRST. > > I*DID* acknowledge your argument first. *I*WAS* talking about YOUR > argument IN YOUR terms. >
NO YOU DIDN'T.
You used a DEBATING TECHNIQUE called A.R.T.S.
AGREE  YES ITS COMPLETE RESTATE TELL STORY  TRUE ITS INCOMPLETE SEE?
The ARGUMENT you ALWAYS IGNORE
is that CLOSED LOGIC IS CLOSED
You ALMOST MADE SENSE.
I did 2 YEARS of this stuff at UNI
They DELIBERATELY left out ZFC in the I.T. degree and for good reason.
They even used a SPECIFICATION LANGUAGE called Z to cover the omission of ZFC from I.T. degrees.
You can EMBED mathematics in the CLOSED LOGIC.
someModel = thisisnotderivablebyaxiomset(A1)
can be modelled as a liar statement in the 1 system.
Herc



