The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Cantor's argument and the Potential Infinite.
Replies: 17   Last Post: Nov 17, 2012 10:59 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

Posts: 3,473
Registered: 12/4/04
Re: Cantor's argument and the Potential Infinite.
Posted: Nov 17, 2012 8:19 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In <k84tuf$t03$>, on 11/16/2012
at 08:36 AM, "LudovicoVan" <> said:

>And you keep missing the point, as the various objections of course
>involve that the standard definition of cardinality for infinite
>sets is wrong!

ROTF,LMAO! A definition can be ambiguous, unconventional or vacuous,
but it can't be wrong.

>Cantor's arguments are *only* applied to potentially infinite sets,
>in fact in standard set theory there is no such thing as actual
>infinity at all.

As usual, you've got it backwards; in standard set theory there is no
such thing as "potential infinity", but only sets[1], some of which
are not finite.

>Please get your head out of your ass


[1] Or sets and classes, depending on which common set theory
you consider standard.

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <>

Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.