Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: spin maximizes the Ampere law that makes the Inert Gases Chapt13.4.03
Charge and spin #1023 New Physics #1143 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 19   Last Post: Dec 4, 2012 5:51 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway Posts: 28 Registered: 11/6/12
Re: spin maximizes the Ampere law that makes the Inert Gases
Posted: Nov 28, 2012 4:11 PM

"Timothy Sutter" wrote in message news:50B66877.2F96@mail.com-...

Don Kelly wrote:

> Timothy Sutter wrote:

> > Don Kelly wrote:

> >> Timothy Sutter wrote:

> >>> Don Kelly wrote:

> >>>> There is my rant and the end of it for me.
> TRUE

doesn't seem to be...the end of it for you.

> >>> V = IR
> FALSE -Tim wrote this

yes, i did write it down, and there's nothing false about it.

> >> Always? Not so.
> TRUE Kelly wrote this

you want a gold star for figuring out what you wrote...

you want a medal just for showing up.

fine.

meaningless baubles of man's vanity anyway...

> > PV = nRT

> TRUE but not quite applicable to electric motors. Do you know why?

the reason it's there is because of this;

yes, there is "non-ohmic" behavior where resistance
is not a linear relationship between potential
difference and current.

here are some nice pictures for you..

http://www.launc.tased.edu.au/online/sciences/PhysSci/done/electric/resistnc/Resistance.htm

and, =similarly=, there is "non-ideal gas" behavior

where one must invoke factors like the "wan der walls" equation

to make up for factors such a compressability

which lead to non-ideal gas behaviors.

and, if you look at the title of this thread you are posting in to,

Pluto tells us;

"spin maximizes the Ampere law that makes the Inert Gases"

now, -i- don't =claim= to know precisely what

Pluto is getting at with this title, =but=

if you look here;

=========================================================
<...>
it's not like the electrons were running on electricity

like they had little electric motors inside of them

and you had to charge them up to get them to spin...
<...>
=========================================================

and i think thats why you're here now...

electric motors because i said the above.

which is one reason i wondered aloud

if -you- were very much -like- Pluto...

> Androcles wrote this

androcles isn't here.

> Now how did Tim manage to twist the quoting and add nothing more than an
> echo?

i did no such thing

this is the way my post looked;

=======================================
Don Kelly wrote:

> Timothy Sutter wrote:

> > Don Kelly wrote:

> > > There is my rant and the end of it for me.

> > V = IR

> Always? Not so.

PV = nRT
=======================================

do you have trouble figuring out who said what?

====
Don Kelly wrote:

> Timothy Sutter wrote:

> > Don Kelly wrote:

> > > There is my rant and the end of it for me. <== Don Kelly

> > V = IR <=== Timothy Sutter

> Always? Not so. <=== Done Kelly

PV = nRT <=== Timothy Sutter
====

and no "androcles" in sight.

> Unless he comes up with something better - he joins pluto.

i think you just need someone to talk to

and you crave praise.

or, you crave being belittled in public

because your 'issue' here is non-existent

trouble is, i'm not looing for a buffoon to slap around

=howeve= should i ever be looking for a buffoon to slap around

feel free to resubmit your resume...
==================================================
Androcles is lurking and you are definitely a babbling wanker with no
knowledge of AC, Sutter.
kVA does not equal kW, punk.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_factor

-- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

Date Subject Author
11/22/12 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
11/22/12 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
11/22/12 Timothy Sutter
11/22/12 --
11/22/12 Timothy Sutter
11/24/12 --
11/24/12 Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
11/24/12 --
11/24/12 Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
11/24/12 --
11/24/12 Timothy Sutter
11/24/12 --
11/25/12 Timothy Sutter
11/25/12 --
11/25/12 Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
11/26/12 Timothy Sutter
11/27/12 --
11/28/12 Timothy Sutter
11/28/12 Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
12/4/12 Timothy Sutter