The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 173
Replies: 1   Last Post: Dec 7, 2012 12:01 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Matheology § 173
Posted: Dec 7, 2012 1:34 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Matheology § 173

The question of language is also particularly relevant, for Brouwer
would continue to emphasize that mathematics does not depend on
language or logic, being prior to language and logic. Language is
merely an instrument of social domination, and it makes impossible a
real communication: ?nobody has ever communicated his soul to someone
else by means of language.? In 1908, this line of thought would derive
into a denounce of classical logic and of axiomatic systems, which
obviously from his standpoint cannot be the real foundation of
mathematics. [...] Brouwer stressed that he had been elaborating these
ideas since 1907, before his involvement with topology, and mentioned
how (in his opinion) they also forced him to disagree with Hilbert?s
conviction that all mathematical problems are solvable. He emphasized
that the foundations for set theory provided both by the logicists and
Zermelo were to be rejected.
[José Ferreirós: "Paradise Recovered? Some Thoughts on Mengenlehre and
Modernism", (2008)]

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.