Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.num-analysis.independent

Topic: The nature of gravity
Replies: 28   Last Post: Apr 11, 2014 4:14 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ] Topics: [ Previous | Next ]
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com

Posts: 61
Registered: 3/17/12
Re: The nature of gravity
Posted: Jan 5, 2013 1:02 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In above posts mention has been made of opposites where a particular mass, such as
the proton, have an opposite where Schwarzschild diameter of one mass is is equal to the Compton wavelength of another mass, the opposite.
For the proton we do not have to look far for a guide to the margin of difference
between opposites, and subsequently, the Planck mass.
Take two separate values, (1) 4 divided by the quantum adjustor, 4/3.62994678,
which equals 1.10194453, and, (2) 1/(c/2)^3, which equals 1/3.3680003x10^24, which inverts to 2.96912087x10^-25 and when then multiplied by 1.10194453
becomes 3.2718065x10^-25. This number doesn't look up to much until you divide it into the proton Compton wavelength, 1.32141x10^-15m/3.2718065x10^-25, and is equal to 4.03877796x10^9. (4.03877796x10^9)^2=1.631172741x10^19, and,
(1.631172741x10^19)^2=2.660724511x10^38.
2.660724511x10^38 multiplied by the mass of the proton comes to 4.45039x10^11kg.
Which is what that 29.6906036, GM product, is all about.

On another topic, mentioned above, the mass of 2.214307982x10^30 inbetweener
mass units has hidden values attached to it.
2.214307982x10^30 divided by the inbetweener Planck mass, 2.822570503x10^-8,
is equal to 7.84500503x10^37. The square of this is 6.154410407x10^75.
We have already worked out that the Schwarzschild radius here must be 3.177611789x10^3m,
and, therefore, the diameter is 6.355223578x10^3m.
(6.355223578x10^3)/(6.154410407x10^75)=1.032629147x10^-72m. Which is the Compton wavelength, expressed in meters, of the mass 2.2143070503x10^30, expressed in inbetweener mass units. It shouldn't take you long to work out
that the mass in kilograms is 2.140381959x10^30Kg and that our differential
(x) persists in being 1.0702704, between kilogram and protonic mass unit and
that the inbetweener mass unit is (x)^0.5 between both.


Date Subject Author
12/29/12
Read The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/3/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/4/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/22/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
2/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
2/23/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/16/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
4/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
4/25/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
5/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
5/4/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
5/6/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
6/1/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
8/13/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
8/24/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
9/9/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
9/19/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
henisdov@netvision.net.il
9/21/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
10/7/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/7/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/14/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/21/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
11/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
11/19/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
m.michael.musatov@gmail.com
4/11/14
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.